Sunday books: Floyd Patterson, a conflicted champion

W.K. Stanton is receiving his praise for his new book on boxer Floyd Patterson.

From the Wall Street Journal:

It is a puzzle how this boxer ever managed to climb to the top of a brutal game. W.K. Stratton’s first-rate Patterson biography attempts to solve the riddle of the most ambivalent of modern gladiators—one who would rush to lift his knockout victims off the canvas and who once even stopped in mid-round to help an opponent find his mouthpiece.

Deadspin ran an excerpt from the book. Here’s an excerpt of the excerpt:

This was Moore’s cue. He rose to his feet and began a blistering verbal attack on Patterson as the cameras rolled and the sportswriters scribbled notes. Patterson was completely taken aback. He believed in treating the opposition with dignity. There was nothing dignified about the words spewing from Moore’s mouth. Finally, Patterson could stand it no longer. He fled the room and hurried through the lobby and out onto the street, where he sucked in some deep breaths of fresh air.

He found a pay phone, called Sandra, and poured his heart out. She was always effective in those days at calming him down. But now he had even more reason to check in with her. Sandra was pregnant and their baby was due to arrive about the same time as the heavyweight title fight. Sandra directed the conversation to the soon-to-arrive baby and how she herself was feeling. She soothed his anger over Moore’s tirade.

Patterson returned to the hotel and completed the interview, although he was irked by later questions about how he planned to stand up against a fighter with Moore’s decades of experience. Floyd believed that he’d learned as much in a short time as Moore had learned over many years, but no boxing prognosticators seemed to consider that possibility.

 

 

Update: Simon & Schuster says Paterno book will be featured on site next week; only 1 appearance scheduled for Posnanski

I finally heard back from Simon & Schuster about my post wondering why the Paterno book is receiving limited play on its site.

In an email, Kelly Welsh, S&S senior publicity manager said:

“Joe Posnanski’s book will be featured on S&S.com home page when it officially goes on-sale next Tuesday, and it will be featured in a newsletter which will go out at the end of the month.”

I followed up by asking if a book tour is planned and if Posnanski would be making any appearances. Welsh replied: “He’s appearing in Kansas City on 9/12.”

Posnanski was a long-time columnist in Kansas City.

Given the magnitude of the book, one appearance is nothing. It speaks to the uncertainty of how the public will receive a book on the tarnished coach. With the backlash so extreme, S&S apparently doesn’t want to risk putting Posnanski out there.

Again, I’m sure this isn’t what Posnanski imagined when he signed up to do this project.

 

 

 

 

 

Paterno book excerpt: Sobbing coach says ‘name is gone’

GQ posted an excerpt of the excerpts it is running from Joe Posnanski’s Paterno book in its September issue.

The post contains a weird illustration of Paterno holding a cell phone while talking to someone with long hair. That couldn’t be Posnanski, who, like me, is hair challenged.

The short excerpts reveal that Scott Paterno was the first person in the inner circle to realize the magnitude of the Sandusky mess. He told his father that he may have coached his last game.

It also discloses that Paterno had no pull left on the Penn State board to bail him out in an effort to save his job.

Then there was this passage:

On Thursday, Paterno met with his coaches at his house. He sobbed  uncontrollably. This was his bad day. Later, one of his former captains, Brandon  Short, stopped by the house. When Brandon asked, “How are you doing, Coach?”  Paterno answered, “I’m okay,” but the last syllable was shaky, muffled by  crying, and then he broke down and said, “I don’t know what I’m going to do with  myself.” Nobody knew how to handle such emotion. Joe had always seemed  invulnerable. On Thursday, though, he cried continually.

“My name,” he told Jay, “I have spent my whole life trying to make that name  mean something. And now it’s gone.”

GQ said it will post the entire excerpt on Monday. Simon & Schuster will release the book on Tuesday.

Clearly, this short excerpt shows the access Posnanski had with the Paterno family. I’m all for access, and it will interesting to see what Posnanski writes about the inner circle’s reaction, leading up to Paterno’s death in January.

However, the book is 400-plus pages. Are you also going to be in the mood to read about Penn State’s great victory over Miami in the 1987 Fiesta Bowl? Probably not.

Again, can’t wait to see how Posnanski attempts to pull this off.

 

 

Sunday books: Q/A with Marty Appel on his ultimate book about Yankees

You could fill a library with all the books written about the Yankees and their players. And leave room for one more: I’m working on a book on the myth and reality of the Babe Ruth “Called Shot” homer.

Indeed, the stories are endless. Marty Appel ties them all together in his new book, Pinstripe Empire: The New York Yankees from before the Babe to after the Boss.

It is a 620-page epic with everything in there. Lots of good stories and baseball history.

Here’s my Q/A with Appel:

How far back do you go with the Yankees?

As a fan, back to the 1955 World Series. As an employee, the 1968 season, Mantle’s last, when I was hired to answer his fan mail.

How long did you work on this project and what was involved in doing the research?

In a sense, I worked on it since 1955, simply by remembering things. I fell in love with baseball and the memories kept adding on. As a writing project though, it was about 2 1/2 years. Knowing how to research and where to look for things I wanted was critical in making it a relatively short period of time, considering it covered 110 years.

The Yankees have such a storied tradition. What stories stand out for you? What are your favorite stories? Perhaps the stories that haven’t received as much attention through the years?

I think the opportunity to get fans better acquainted with Jacob Ruppert, who co-owned and then owned the team from 1915-1939, emerged as a powerful story. He was a great sportsman, he bought Babe Ruth, he built Yankee Stadium, he created the dynasty. He epitomized wealth in the 20th century, but he had to deal with anti-German feelings in the country following World War 1, then with prohibition, which effectively wiped out his brewery, and then with the Great Depression which kept the baseball industry stagnant for a decade. And he prevailed.

Who were your favorite characters? Known and perhaps unknown?

It’s hard to ignore Babe Ruth with this question, for he was so much more than the big lug America came to love. After the president and perhaps Charlie Chaplin, he was the best known American, and baseball had never had such a personality before, someone to capture the attention of so many.

Why have the Yankees been able to maintain their success over the years?

Ruppert set in place a practice of putting profits back into the team. It was something that George Steinbrenner did as well. That was the key, along with the legacy that was built so that players, when able to move on their own, wanted to wear the same uniform as Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle and now Jeter.

Doesn’t it get boring having a team that wins every year? Speaking from a guy who lives in Chicago.

Nope! But honestly, if you were born in the late ’50s, or the mid 70s, you had to be almost 20 years old to cash in with your first world championship. That’s a long wait for what others consider a birthright.

 

Sunday books: Dominique Moceanu reveals other side of gymnastics

The U.S. women/kids gymnasts winning the gold medal Tuesday certainly was a great uplifting story.

However, Dominique Moceanu reveals in her new book that life as a top teenage gymnast isn’t all warm and fuzzy.

From the blurb on Amazon:

AT FOURTEEN YEARS OLD, Dominique Moceanu was the youngest member of the 1996 U.S. Women’s Olympic Gymnastics team, the first and only American women’s team to take gold at the Olympics. Her pixyish appearance and ferocious competitive drive quickly earned her the status of media darling. But behind the fame, the flawless floor routines, and the million-dollar smile, her life was a series of challenges and hardships.Off Balance vividly delineates each of the dominating characters who contributed to Moceanu’s rise to the top, from her stubborn father and long-suffering mother to her mercurial coach, Bela Karolyi. Here, Moceanu finally shares the haunting stories of competition, her years of hiding injuries and pain out of fear of retribution from her coaches, and how she hit rock bottom after a public battle with her parents.

But medals, murder plots, drugs, and daring escapes aside (all of which figure into Moceanu’s incredible journey), the most unique aspect of her life is the family secret that Moceanu discovers, opening a new and unexpected chapter in her adult life. A mysterious letter from a stranger reveals that she has a second sister—born with a physical disability and given away at birth—who has nonetheless followed in Moceanu’s footsteps in an astonishing way.

A multilayered memoir that transcends the world of sports, Off Balance will touch anyone who has ever dared to dream of a better life.

Simon & Schuster standing behind Posnanski book; book tour looks to be limited

Given all that continues to unfurl in the Penn State case, it is unfathomable that a proper biography could come out now about Joe Paterno.

Yet Simon & Schuster is going ahead with Joe Posnanski’s book, Paterno, which is set to be released Aug. 21. However, don’t expect to see Posnanski do a full-blown book tour.

From a story in the New York Times:

Now Simon & Schuster is limiting interviews with Mr. Posnanski and scaling back a planned book tour. Anne Tate, a spokeswoman for the publisher, said in an e-mail, “We’re sensitive about putting our author in forums where he might be viewed as a stand-in for his subject.”

Jonathan Karp, the publisher of Simon & Schuster, said in an interview that the release of the Freeh report had complicated matters for the book.

“It’s made people angrier at Joe Paterno,” he said. “And that has made it a more difficult environment to publish a biography about Joe Paterno.”

Later:

Mr. Karp heatedly defended his author, pointing out that the book had been under a strict embargo and that review copies had not been distributed. Few people, he said, have read it.

“I will say this — I think there has been a lot online about this book,” Mr. Karp said. “And I’m amazed by some of the vitriol with regard to Joe Posnanski, who is a truly gifted writer. People can pass all the judgment they want about Joe Paterno, but Joe Posnanski deserves a chance to be read.”

But this doesn’t bode well for sales:

Michael Fox, the owner of Joseph Fox Bookshop in Philadelphia, has not read “Paterno,” but he knows he does not want to order a single copy.

“I just don’t want it on my shelf,” Mr. Fox said last week. “It’s distasteful and it’s not up to date. I’m sure there’s a lot of college football fans who want to read about the greatest coach of all time. But it’s not something I want to have in my store.”

According to the story, Posnanski was paid $750,000 to write the book. At this point, he has to wonder if it was worth it.

 

 

 

 

Sunday bookshelf: Creamer on Babe Ruth’s sexual appetite and ‘Called Shot homer’

The book was published in 1974. Yet chances are if you go to a book store, you still will be able to find Robert Creamer’s Babe: The Legend Comes to Life.

Talk about setting the standard. Creamer’s biography was the Babe Ruth of sports books.

In tribute to Creamer, who died Thursday at the age of 90, I thought it would be fitting to recall his most famous work.

The book touched on all facets of Ruth’s incredible life, including his huge appetite for sex. It was well-known to most insiders, but Creamer brought it out in the open.

Creamer writes:

There is a story, probably apocryphal, about a time he and (Bob Meusel) were barnstorming together. They shared a hotel suite. Meusel was half asleep when Ruth came in with a girl, went into his room and made love to her in his usual noisy fashion. Afterwards, he came out to the living room of the suite, lit a cigar and sat in a chair by the window, smoking contemplatively…

In the morning, Meusel asked, “How many times did you lay that girl last night?” Ruth glanced at the ashtray and so did Meusel. There were seven butts in the tray.

“Count the cigars,” said Ruth.

Obviously, though, it was baseball that made Ruth a legend. Here’s Creamer on Ruth’s famous “Called Shot” homer at Wrigley Field:

Now. What about the legend ? What about the story, often affirmed, often denied, that Babe pointed to a spot in center field and then hit the ball precisely to that spot ? It is an argument over nothing, and the fact that Ruth did not point to center field before his home run does not diminish in the least what he did. He did challenge the Cubs before 50,000 people, did indicate he was going to hit a home run and did hit a home run. What more could you ask?

Later he writes:

Ford Frick, who was not at the game, tried to pin Ruth down on the subject when the two were talking about the Series some time later.

“Did you really point to the bleachers?” Frick asked.

Ruth, always honest, shrugged. “It’s in the papers, isn’t it?” he said.

“Yeah,” Frick said. “It’s in the papers. But did you really point to the stands ?”

“Why don’t you read the papers? It’s all right there in the papers.”

Which, Frick said, means he never said he did and he never said he didn’t.

 

 

 

 

Sports Illustrated’s Wertheim: Posnanski book may be ‘literary version of Matt Millen fiasco’

Yet another post in the continuing saga of the Paterno book:

Jon Wertheim appears on The Sports-Casters podcast this week. Wertheim has been part of Sports Illustrated’s coverage of Penn State and spent time with Joe Posnanski in State College.

When Sports-Casters’ Steve Bennett asked about the growing controversy over Posnanski’s upcoming book about the now tarnished coach, Wertheim emitted a large groan.

Clearly, he didn’t want to weigh in about a sensitive subject regarding his former colleague and somebody greatly admired in the sportswriting fraternity. However, years of enduring athletes and coaches duck the tough questions made Wertheim feel compelled to comment.

Like others, Wertheim, the author of seven books, thinks Posnanski and Simon & Schuster are making a mistake by rushing the book to market in August. He said:

My better instincts are telling me to say “no comment,” but there is something terminally lame about a journalist whose whole job it is to advance stories and get people to talk to play the no comment card.

It is just an impossible situation for Joe. Impossible. I suspect that if he knew any of this, he never would have ever taken this book deal. There is no way to put a good face on this. Whether we want to admit it or not, there are commercial pressures. I think that I would have not have gone along with my publisher’s wishes to capitalize on the timeliness and rush the book out for late this summer. There is no way that was going to end cleanly; it just couldn’t be done. We all knew that this Freeh report was coming; we know there is going to be civil litigation; and more stuff is going to come out.

There is a business decision and I get that. There is a publisher that has made a significant investment. But I think sometimes you need to just fold at the poker table. Joe did not want to be Sara Ganim. Joe had a certain book in mind and his research was geared toward that and this was a huge hairpin turn. He did not want to own the story and start competing with Sara Ganim.

I’m not sure how anyone benefits with rushing a book out. It takes advantage of the timing, but it’s awful timing. It’s timing that basically just obliterates Joe Paterno. If I’m (Posnanski), I may have just cut bait. I also might have said let’s really take a step back and wait…I have a feeling this is not going to be pretty.

The great lesson that Paterno may have taught (a player) pales in comparison to the cover-up. People who read the book will say they don’t care about (his great deeds). I worry this will be the literary version of the Matt Millen fiasco.

It all seems really insignificant in the face of this horrible story. I like Joe (Posnanski) personally. I like Joe professionally. I would love to see him do this book in 2014 when all the facts come out. In 2012, boy, how do you release a book about a guy when bombs are going off? I don’t envy him, but I have a hard time seeing how this plays out when you have a book six weeks after such a damming report comes out.

Posnanski video for Paterno book has been removed

I assume somebody at Simon & Schuster also decided the video Joe Posnanski did promoting Paterno was no longer appropriate.

As you can see when you hit play, it says: “This video has been removed by user.”

The video also can’t be found on Youtube (where it existed yesterday) and on the Amazon page for the book, which is where I saw it in the first place last week.

However, the video still can be seen on a Deadspin post that says Sports Illustrated decided to pass on running an excerpt on the book. Not sure why that’s the case. If I’m missing something here, please let me know.

Here’s the link of what I wrote earlier today about the video being off base in the wake of the Freeh Commission Report. Posnanski did the two-minute prior to last Thursday when Louis Freeh hammered Paterno and Penn State.

The video has a graphic with a header that reads: “Joe Paterno: Educator. Coach. Humanitarian.”

I’ve heard Paterno called many things in the last week, but “humanitarian” isn’t one of them.

Anyway, an interesting day for Posnanski and his book. Surely more to come in advance of the book being released Aug. 21.

 

 

Payton biographer thinks Posnanski should scrap Paterno book; says past quotes may haunt him

Like me, Jeff Pearlman, who wrote the bestselling Walter Payton biography, has some concerns about Joe Posnanski’s ability to pull off the Joe Paterno book.

He writes on his blog:

 I scrap the whole thing. I put it aside, maybe wait a year or two, then—when the dust clears and the implications are more understood—I return and write a real biography. Joe is a wonderful writer and, by all accounts, a good guy. I love his blog, and his pieces on infomercials are some of the funniest things I’ve ever read. I can’t say this enough times—Joe is terrific. A genuine wordsmith.

But there is no possible way, one month removed from a report that details Joe Paterno’s knowledge of a pedophile roaming the Penn State campus (and his refusal to do anything about it, when he clearly could/should have), a proper biography can be released. No. Possible. Way.

Can’t happen.

Given that the book is expected to be a bestseller, it is highly unlikely Simon & Schuster will ditch the project at this late date. Publishers like bestsellers.

Pearlman also has concerns about a session Posnanski did with a communications class at Penn State last December. Posnanski defended Paterno at the time.

Pearlman said a person in the class put out the following tweets, quoting Posnanski.

“I think [Paterno] is a scapegoat. I definitely think that…I think he tried to do the right thing, and the right thing didn’t happen.”

“A lot of people came here to bury Joe. As a writer, I’m mad with that, as someone who’s come to know the Paternos, I’m heartbroken.”

“The only thing people remember about Woody Hayes is that he hit a player. I don’t want that to happen to Joe. He didn’t hit a player.”

Pearlman then writes:

Those words might come to haunt Posnanski. And, perhaps, they should. Journalists are allowed to like their subjects, and even become sympathetic (and empathetic) toward them. There is a line, however, that can’t be crossed; the line when you go from enjoying someone to irrationally and inappropriately defending someone. Clearly, at the time Joe Posnanski didn’t know enough, and didn’t have his facts correct. He blasted his peers in the media, without realizing that, just maybe, they were right and he was wrong; that perhaps the coach he had come to admire and (it seems) love wasn’t worthy of the affection.

Again, I’m a great admirer of Posnanski’s work. But I can’t imagine he’s getting much sleep these days.