Rick Majerus: ESPN’s Wojciechowski remembers a special friend

I knew Gene Wojciechowski and Dan McGrath were having a tough day Saturday when I heard the news that Rick Majerus passed away.

Gene, a columnist for ESPN.com, and Dan, my former sports editor at the Chicago Tribune, were extremely close to the basketball coach.

Gene assisted Majerus with his autobiography. It’s a fun read, and I know from his stories that Gene had even more fun working with Majerus on the book.

Gene wrote Saturday: “To this day, I think the only reason he agreed to let me write his autobiography is because it would help pay for my kids’ college tuition. That was Majerus.”

Dan, meanwhile, dates back to Marquette with Majerus. He talked of him often and I can remember on several occasions that he had to leave the office to hook up with Majerus as he breezed through Chicago.

Through Gene and Dan, I got to meet Majerus a few times. He was as you would imagine him to be: Friendly, fun and completely unpretentious for a coach who accomplished so much in the game.

Gene and Dan’s relationship with Majerus underscores the best thing about being a sportswriter. It isn’t about the games. It’s about the people you meet.

I know Gene and Dan feel fortunate today that as a sportswriters they got to meet Rick Majerus.

Gene did a wonderful tribute to Majerus. Here is an excerpt.

Majerus was 10 of the smartest people I’ve ever known. The Jesuits educated him well. He was a coach, but he could have been a councilman. He lived in a hotel during much of his career, but his suites often were filled with books. He’d call at night just to talk about a Maureen Dowd column he had read an hour earlier.

He won games, lots and lots of them, but I swear he cared more about seeing his players get diplomas than victories.

He could charm an entire national press corps. He could alienate an entire local media corps. He could hold court. He could hold grudges.

Majerus didn’t suffer fools. He was brilliant, complex and demanding to a fault. He also was loyal, caring and giving to a fault.

City with most viewers for college basketball? Hint: It’s not in North Carolina

With the college basketball season starting, ESPN Front Row examined the ratings for its men’s game telecasts in the 56 metered markets from the 2002-03 season through 2011-12.

And the winner? Louisville.

From ESPN:

Highlights:

One leads the way: Louisville was the top market every year, averaging a 4.1 rating or higher the past five seasons, including a 5.3 in 2009-10.

Six in Second:Six of the 56 markets have finished a season in the second highest-rated spot:

Greensboro is the only market to make multiple second place appearances: 2011, 2008, 2006, 2005, and 2002-03.

The additional five markets: Columbus (2010-11), Kansas City (2009-10), Indianapolis (2007-08), Raleigh-Durham (2004-05) and Cincinnati (2003-04).

Here are the top markets for 2011-12:

Top 25 Markets for 2011-12
No. 1       Louisville: 4.5 rating
No. 2       Greensboro: 3.5 rating
No. 3        Kansas City: 2.8 rating
No. 4       Columbus: 2.7 rating
               Raleigh-Durham 2.7 rating
No. 6       Charlotte: 2.3 rating
No. 7       Cincinnati: 2.1 rating
No. 8       Dayton: 2.0 rating
No. 9       Indianapolis: 1.8 rating
               Knoxville: 1.8 rating
No. 11     Memphis: 1.6 rating
               Nashville: 1.6 rating
No. 13     Greenville: 1.5 rating
No. 14     Cleveland: 1.4 rating
               Birmingham: 1.4 rating
               Las Vegas: 1.4 rating
No. 17     Norfolk: 1.2 rating
               Hartford: 1.2 rating
               St. Louis: 1.2 rating
No. 20     Fort Myers: 1.1 rating
               Atlanta: 1.1 rating
               Richmond: 1.1 rating
No. 23     Pittsburgh: 1.0 rating
               Detroit: 1.0 rating
               Oklahoma City: 1.0 rating
               Jacksonville: 1.0 rating
               Tulsa: 1.0 rating

 

Indiana’s Cody Zeller gets cover treatment from Sports Illustrated, ESPN Magazine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As a University of Illinois alum, all I can say it that it was nice while it lasted. Following the implosion of Kelvin Sampson, Indiana became irrelevant for a few years. The decimated Hoosiers went 6-25 (1-17 in the Big Ten), 10-21, 12-20 during Tom Crean’s first three years.

However, Crean definitely was the right man for the job. Indiana jumped to 27-9 last year and with cover boy Cody Zeller (Note: SI used five regional covers), the Hoosiers are the preseason No. 1 in Sports Illustrated and ESPN Magazine.

Perhaps, it’s just as well. Things always are a bit more interesting when the traditional powers are in play.

Now let’s see if Zeller and Indiana live up to expectations.

*******

Richard Deitsch has a comprehensive preview of TV coverage of college basketball at SI.com. It includes a Q/A with Jay Bilas, who had an interesting comment on the lack of a defined started to the season.

Bilas said:

We have no recognized start to the season. The NCAA owns the NIT, which is  nearly invisible at the end of the season. Why not move the NIT to the beginning  of the year, invite the top sixteen teams (which could include at least the top  four mid-majors), and have a national championship event to start the season? In  our game, everyone knows when practice starts. It starts on Oct. 15, but nobody  knows when the season starts. We can fix that, and we can place greater emphasis  on the regular season and make it more meaningful to fans. That is where the  success of the NCAA tournament has negatively impacted the overall game.