Revenge of fan shot: Fox botches game-ending pick-off

For years, Fox Sports has been criticized for its quick-cut players/fan reaction shots between pitches.Sunday night, the technique came back to bite the network.

As a result, a St. Louis woman holding a rebird hat (puppet?) will forever be a part of one of the most unusual endings ever to a World Series game.

Fox lingered a bit too long on the woman. All of the sudden, Joe Buck yelled out and there was a quick shot of Mike Napoli applying the tag to Kolten Wong from a terrible camera angle. Viewers never saw Koji Uehara turn and make the throw for the dramatic pick-off.

It wasn’t until the replays were shown that we had any perspective of what happened.

The reality is that all the networks show player/manager/fan reaction shots between pitches. So what happened to Fox Sports last could have happened to any of them.

However, the fact that Fox insists on doing so many of them, to the distraction of many viewers including this one, warrants a more intense finger-pointing after what happened last night.

If a similar situation occurs in Game 5, the Fox cameras should just stay with the pitcher. You never know when he will turn and throw to first to end the game.

 

 

Why not a Saturday afternoon World Series game?

Trivia question: When was the last afternoon game in a World Series?

Answer: Game 6 of the Minnesota-St. Louis World Series in 1987.

I get the idea for having night games in the World Series during the week and even on Sunday, a prime TV viewing night. However, nobody stays home on Saturday night to watch TV.

Indeed, a late Saturday afternoon game would be a prime opportunity to capture some of those younger viewers, especially on the East Coast, for whom the World Series has become a rumor. The 8:07 ET first pitch for all the games means most of them are in bed by the fourth inning.

Check out this tweet from the TV Sports Ratings guy:

Baseball is losing a generation of young fans, who likely won’t grow up to become old fans, by playing all these World Series games at night.

I would bet that the ratings for a late afternoon Saturday World Series game would be comparable to an 8:07 ET start. Even if they were off slightly, so what? Consider it an investment in the game’s future.

Time to let the sun shine, baseball. At least for one game.

Update: It has been pointed out to me that Game 3 of the 2010 World Series started at 6:57 ET, the earliest since 1987. MLB actually made a big deal of it.

From the release back then:

“I am extremely pleased we are able to provide our fans the earliest World Series start time since 1987 with Saturday’s Game Three,'” said Baseball Commissioner Allan H. (Bud) Selig. “The changes we made with FOX last year to start the World Series games earlier helped increase viewership including more young fans and we are optimistic that the earlier start time for Saturday’s Game Three will keep us moving in the same direction.”

Key to the earlier scheduled start time for Game Three is an additional level of advertising support from Chevrolet, the official vehicle of Major League Baseball, and a perennial sponsor of MLB on FOX.

“Starting the game earlier will allow more families to watch together,” said Chris Perry, vice president U.S. marketing, Chevrolet. “This fits perfectly with our commitment to baseball which stretches from youth teams across the country to MLB.”

“We’ve said over the years that if advertisers were willing to support earlier starts at prime time levels, we’d be able to begin games earlier,” said FOX Sports president Eric Shanks. “We’re excited to be working with MLB and Chevrolet, along with our FOX-owned stations and affiliates to make this happen.”

*******

Hmm. Wonder why baseball abandoned the concept?

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in MLB

Garagiola Jr. on long games: ‘You have to cut teams a little slack’; Why?

Jerry Cransnick of ESPN.com talked to Joe Garagiola Jr., who reports to Joe Torre as baseball’s senior vice president of standards and on-field operations, about the long games in the postseason.

“These are the most important games of the year, so you don’t want to ask teams to start doing things that really impact how they approach the game,” Garagiola said from Fenway Park, where Boston is hosting St. Louis in the first two games of the World Series. “That said, the umpires will encourage teams to try to maintain a good pace, because I think everybody likes that.

“But if people are taking a little more time between pitches, or batters are stepping out because they want to compose themselves, it’s because somebody is going to be the world champion at the end of the next eight or nine days. You can’t lose sight of that.”

Later, Garagiola added:

“You have to cut the teams a little slack,” Garagiola said. “If you’re seeing more trips to the mound and looking in the dugouts, this is not the time to be confused or unclear or have the pitcher and catcher not be on the same page. One swing and everybody goes home.”

Obviously, everyone knows where I stand on this issue. My questions to Garagiola Jr.: Why is it different now than when your dad played in the 40s and 50s and called games in the 70s and 80s? Weren’t the stakes just as high back then? How come they were able to finish games in 2:15-2:30?

Even if you add the additional 20 minutes for commercials, the 2:30 game only is 2:50. Prior to last night, the average game during the postseason was 3:22. While last night’s Game 2 was a relatively quick 3:05, that’s still too long for a 4-2 game.

Please Joe Jr., do something about the pace.

 

Posted in MLB

Assessing Tim McCarver’s legacy: Record-setting longevity, candor, and critics

My latest column for the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana examines the legacy of Tim McCarver. This year’s World Series marks the end of an unprecedented run in sports broadcast history.

*******

Fox Sports held a teleconference for its World Series coverage earlier this week. Naturally, one of the first questions was directed at Tim McCarver, who will be calling his last series for the network.

“I don’t mind answering a couple (personal) questions, but the emphasis should be on the Series and the players involved,” McCarver said.

McCarver then went on to praise Fox Sports executives and began to get sentimental about his long-time partner Joe Buck.

When it came time for his turn, Buck, trying to lighten the mood with perfect timing, said, “I can’t wait for this to be over.”

Everyone laughed, and Buck paid tribute to McCarver. Then after a couple more baseball questions about the Red Sox and Cardinals, McCarver was asked again to reflect on his career.

McCarver answered and then made another plea: “I would prefer this be the last question about my final World Series, please. I respectfully request that.”

Indeed, if this whole thing feels awkward, it’s probably because it is. It gets to the core of a somewhat complicated broadcast legacy for McCarver.

I’m not so sure McCarver, 72, wants to walk away from his duties at Fox. He continues to emphasize that he isn’t retiring from the booth.

Last week, he told Chad Finn of the Boston Globe, “I’m not retiring. I’m cutting back on what I’ll be doing. I won’t be doing the World Series, playoffs, All-Star Game, but I’ll be doing something, stuff that will feed my passions. Plural.”

So why not just stay at Fox? The network could have reduced his regular-season workload, allowing him to be its signature analyst during the postseason.

It didn’t work out that way.

With McCarver’s contract set to expire this year, perhaps he had enough of hearing from critics who haven’t always been kind in recent years. There’s also the sense that Fox wants to bring in new blood in the analyst’s chair to freshen up its baseball broadcasts.

At some point, it’s just time to move on.

So whenever the final out is made next week, McCarver likely will be wrapping up the portion of his career that is unmatched in baseball broadcast history. This marks his 24th World Series as an analyst, a record. Remarkably, he did it for three different networks, beginning with ABC in 1985, when he teamed with Al Michaels and Jim Palmer for the St. Louis-Kansas City series. He followed the national TV baseball package to CBS and then Fox.

You don’t become the lead analyst for a generation without having some considerable talent. Once moving to the broadcast booth, McCarver quickly became known for an uncanny knack of anticipating what would happen in a game. Buck says there’s nobody better.

*******

Here’s the link for the rest of the column.

 

 

Snore Classic: Baseball, Fox need to break numbing trend of short World Series

Forget about all the talk of Boston-St. Louis being a great match-up in the World Series.

If given the choice, Fox Sports and MLB would take a Seattle-San Diego series that goes 7 games over a one-sided 4- or 5-gamer featuring two of baseball’s most storied franchises.

It’s all about games, namely 6 and 7 in the postseason. Those have been in short supply for baseball, which has suffered through a remarkable string of bad luck with its World Series.

Since 2004, when the Red Sox took four straight from the Cardinals (seem to recalling hearing something about breaking an 86-year drought), only 2 of 9 World Series have gone more than five games. There have been four sweeps, including last year with San Francisco running over Detroit; and three five-game series. The lone seven-game series was in 2011 when St. Louis rallied to beat Texas.

By comparison, the NBA has seen three Game 7s since 2004, and 6 of the 9 series went to six or more games. The NHL even has fared better. Since 2001, 6 of 12 Stanley Cup Finals have gone the full 7 games, allowing viewers to hear Mike Emrick, the game’s best, to enhance the drama with his wonderful gift for play-by-play. Only two series failed to reach six games.

Fox’s Joe Buck only wishes he was as fortunate. When Buck was asked about this year’s supposed dream match-up, he tempered his answer.

“Year after year, we talk about the match-up, and who the networks want, and the major markets,” Buck said. “To me, if it isn’t a compelling series, if it is four or five games and out, it doesn’t matter who is playing. If you don’t get down to the games that make it fun, like at the beginning of the post-season where it is win or go home…That’s when the game gets exciting. That’s when the game is great.

“We had Boston in 2007 and they won in four straight (over Colorado). The ratings went down. You don’t have to be a genius to figure it out.”

Indeed, last year’s World Series averaged a 7.6 rating, an all-time low. The previous low was an 8.4 for the 2008 Phillies-Rays and 2010 Giants-Rangers series, which each went five games.

Meanwhile, the 2011 Cardinals-Rangers World Series averaged a 10.0 rating for the full run. As Buck said, you don’t need to be a genius to see how the run of short series have hurt baseball and Fox.

Given Buck and Tim McCarver’s ties, they certainly will be accused of favoring the Cardinals.That would be wrong. They only are pulling for one thing during the World Series: Getting to call a Game 7.

 

 

 

 

ESPN’s Caple on slow baseball: ‘If you aren’t going to hit the ball, don’t waste our time’

Great game last night, right? Sure, but there’s still something wrong about a 4-3 game lasting 3 hours, 47 minutes.

It isn’t just me complaining. Earlier this week, ESPN’s Jim Caple weighed in, obviously tired of watching endless games.

Caple wrote:

Almost four hours for a 1-0 game in which one team didn’t get a hit until the ninth inning? What, are they trying to keep pace with the Republicans and Democrats in Congress?

And no, the American League broadcast did not include more commercials, although you could probably air a couple of Geico ads during a typical Boston at-bat and not miss anything important.

It isn’t just the Red Sox.

Much of the blame for these lengthy games goes to the Red Sox, who grind out at-bats until the starter reaches his pitch limit or simply falls asleep on the mound. But it’s not just them. The Athletics and Tigers played a 1-0 game in their division series that lasted nearly three and a half hours. Sonny Gray’s mustache had almost filled out by the time that game ended.

Caple concludes:

Batters will contend that working the count wears down the pitcher, gets them better pitches to hit and makes them more successful. But mostly, it just means they strike out more often. Batting averages are lower than they’ve been since before the DH era began. Strikeouts are at an all-time high. Players are not hitting any better; they’re just taking longer to fail.

Look, if you aren’t going to hit the ball, don’t waste our time. Stay in the box. Don’t fiddle with your gloves. Just get it over with in three pitches and grab some bench.

We don’t want to finish the game with beards that would shame the Smith cough drop brothers.

Amen to that.

 

Posted in MLB

Watch with your kids: Essence of Mariano Rivera captured in new BEING documentary

If anyone deserves to have a documentary, it is Mariano Rivera. If it is possible, you will have an even higher opinion of the Yankees great after watching this film.

There’s a moving segment in which prior to a game, Rivera meets with a Kansas City family, which had just lost a son. The compassion that he shows gets to the heart of Rivera.

This is film you should watch with your kids. Talk about setting an example.

Here is the official rundown from Fox.

Baseball debates are as old as the game itself: Ruth or Aaron? Feller or Ryan? Brock or Henderson?  However, there is one position where debate is pointless: Who is the game’s best closer?  On this, fans, players, coaches, historians and media all agree:  Mariano Rivera, and as most know, the 2013 regular season was his last as an active player.  Granted unprecedented and exclusive access to many of Rivera’s most private moments since before spring training, BEING: MARIANO RIVERA, the definitive 90-minute television documentary from FOX Sports Originals, Relativity Television and Major League Baseball Productions on the reticent superstar’s final season in pinstripes, premieres Sunday, Oct. 20 on FOX (2:30 or 4:30 PM ET; check local listings), with an encore presentation on Tuesday, Oct. 22 on FOX Sports 1 (8:30 PM ET).

A man of deep religious conviction, Rivera was a ferocious competitor who, win or lose, always respected the game.  A nurturing teammate, he freely offered guidance to young pitchers hoping to attain a fraction of his consistency and success, awestruck by his staggering career statistics: 19-years, all with the New York Yankees; 13-time All-Star; seven World Series, winning five; 652 career saves, with another 42 in postseason play.

“Throughout his remarkable career Rivera shied away from the spotlight and simply let his dominance over hitters and good work off-the-field speak volumes, so perhaps its counterintuitive that he would agree to allow cameras access to such intimate moments, but that’s just what he did,” said Michael Bloom, FOX Sports’ Senior Vice President, Original Programming.  “It will be an honor to present BEING: MARIANO RIVERA on FOX Sports and FOX Sports 1.”

“We’re honored and privileged that a man universally regarded as the best to ever play his position let us in to uncover the mystique of his final season,” said Tom Forman, CEO of Relativity Television.  “Our cameras find him in never-before-seen moments at work, at play, with family and friends, baseball legends, competitors and politicians alike.  Despite what fans may have already seen, BEING: MARIANO RIVERA is more thorough than any televised tribute to date.”

“MLB Productions has a proven track record and has established a significant level of trust among MLB players over the years, but given how closely Mariano guards his privacy, we’re extremely appreciative of the access he has granted us this season,” added Chris Tully, Senior Vice President, Broadcasting, Major League Baseball. “This special is a rare glimpse behind the curtain with one of the truly legendary figures in the game.”

 

Posted in MLB

Why games moved faster in ’59: Batters stayed in box; pitchers worked quickly

Tom Hoffarth of the Los Angeles Daily News discovered this gem: A broadcast of a Dodgers-Cardinals game from the Coliseum on July 25, 1959. Jack Brickhouse, a legend, is on the call.

As you know, I’ve been on my soapbox about the maddening length of baseball games. Well, take a look at this video and it is painfully obvious what occurred back then.

The batters stayed in the box between pitches and the pitchers worked quickly. Really simple.

Lo and behold, what was the result? The Cardinals beat the Dodgers 4-2 in 2 hours, 11 minutes.

Oh by the way, the game went 10 innings. Yes, an extra inning game was completed in about the same time it takes the today’s game to get through six innings.

Yesterday’s game times: Detroit-Boston: 3:27; Cardinals-Dodgers: 3:10.

Take a good look at this video, Major League Baseball. This is how they used to play your game. Time to turn back the clock and do it this way again.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in MLB

Losing: Sagging ratings, expensive right fees have WGN-AM looking to rework deal with Cubs

My latest Chicago Tribune column is on WGN-AM 720 and the Cubs.

You also can access via my Twitter feed.

From the column.

*******

If the Cubs want to continue their long relationship with WGN-AM 720, dating back to 1925, they likely will have to do it at a reduced price.

Strapped with an expensive rights deal and sharply declining ratings because of the Cubs’ struggles on the field, WGN is exercising an option to re-open their contract with the team.

Broadcast sources say WGN is losing significant money on the Cubs broadcasts, with listeners and advertisers tuning out a team that has lost 197 games in the last two years.

Cubs games still will air on the station in 2014, but beyond that, the two sides will have to agree on a new deal.

WGN-AM President Jimmy de Castro declined to discuss any of the specifics of the situation. However, he stressed several times that he hopes the Cubs continue to be on WGN.

“Like any contract, there are periods where you do a business analysis,” de Castro said. “Both the Cubs and WGN are looking at it. We love our partnership and we hope it continues forever. The contract calls for us to take a look at it and we’re going to do that.”

In other words: Forever will end abruptly if the money isn’t right for WGN.

Broadcast insiders say the current contract calls for WGN to pay as much as $10 million per year to Cubs (“Maybe more,” said one source), making it one of the most expensive in Major League Baseball.

The Yankees recently signed a deal with WFAN in New York, calling for an annual payout estimated in the $15-20 million range.

The Cubs reportedly did a new contract with WGN in 2009 in advance of Tribune Co. selling the team to the Ricketts family. Back then, the Cubs were one year removed from back-to-back playoff appearances in 2007-08. They still were considered a hot commodity, attracting strong ratings on both TV and radio.

Well, not so much in 2013.