Posnanski on Steve Sabol: You could not ignore him

As I wrote last week, Joe Posnanski has moved to NBC, where among his duties, he will write a “Big Read” column on Fridays for NBCSports.com. His latest effort was a nice piece on Steve Sabol.

Posnanski writes:

Steve Sabol never hid his intentions or his motivations. He saw it as his life’s goal to make everyone see pro football the way he saw it — as the greatest thing in the entire world. Of this, he had no doubts, no uncertainty, no hesitation. This is what it means to be a true believer.

His first big effort for NFL Films was the seminal film, “They Call It Pro Football,” made in 1966. “It starts with a whistle and ends with a gun,” John Facenda said at the beginning of that movie, which changed everything and is now listed in the National Film Registry at the Library of Congress.

“It was our Citizen Kane,” Steve Sabol said. He was 24 years old and ready to spill everything he loved about football, everything he believed about football, everything he cherished about football onto the screen. It would be big, it would be bold, it would be over the top — that was how Sabol did things.

 

Posted in NFL

Manti Te’o to NFL Network: I can obviously do a lot better

Is there another player in the draft? All I know is that after running a slow 4.8 today, he opened a few eyes again. Again, not in a good way.

As a public service for those who can’t get enough, there’s this from NFL Network.

******

Former Notre Dame linebacker Manti Te’o joined NFL Total Access on Monday following his on-field workout at the NFL Scouting Combine. He spoke with Rich Eisen and Mike Mayock:

On the NFL Scouting Combine:

“It is very exhausting. If you ask anyone out here, it is a very exhausting process. It is all about getting out there, being with the guys, showing that you can get out there and do things.”

On his performance at NFL Scouting Combine:

“I did OK. I can obviously do a lot better… do a lot better. That is what pro days are for.”

On what his 40-yard dash time was when he was training:

“I was running near a 4.6, a 4.5. Today was just a long, long day. I am just going to go and keep training and make sure when my pro day comes, I am running those numbers.”

On what to expect at his Notre Dame pro day:

“I want to run my 40 [yard-dash]. I want to get after it, be with my teammates. I am going to have a lot of teammates over there competing as well. Yes, [I will have energy going], it will be a family reunion thing. [People can expect] better numbers. [I will be] rested. One day you hit it hard and then you are done.”

On which teams he spoke with interviews:

“I spoke to 20 teams.”

He then said he did not speak with the New England Patriots when prompted by Rich Eisen. He did confirm meeting with the Baltimore Ravens, the Cincinnati Bengals, and the Denver Broncos

On if he broke down plays during his interview process:

“That is where I am in my comfort zone. That is where I made the most strides this week, on the board, with the film. Not only telling them what I am doing, [but] what the safety is doing, why this guy has to do this thing and  for them to see that not only do I know what I am doing, but I know what the other 10 guys are doing. That is a big plus for me.”

On the best part of his performance today:

“I think I did best with my [on-field] drills. It is football. It is getting around corners, changing directions. That is why I did the best, but the thing is, I can do a lot better. That is exactly what is going to happen.”

On his sleep schedule at the NFL Scouting Combine:

“Getting to bed on average [midnight], 1:00 AM depending on when the interviews are and getting up at 4:00 AM, 5:00 AM for [testing]. This morning was the latest I woke up and that was 6:37 AM.”


Posted in NFL

Will Phil Simms be analyst for CBS’ next Super Bowl in 2016?

During the lead-up to Sunday’s game, Lance Barrow, CBS’ coordinating producer, was asked when preparations began for this year’s Super Bowl?

“The day after our last Super Bowl (in 2010),” Barrow said.

So that means Monday was day 1 of CBS’ preparations for Super Bowl L (the big 5-0) in 2016, the next time it has the big game. While the question may not have been discussed yesterday, you can be sure it will be asked within the highest reaches of the network: Will CBS give Phil Simms another shot at the Super Bowl?

CBS is an extremely loyal place, and Simms has been a good ambassador and a capable soldier, serving as its lead NFL analyst since 1998. Sunday was Simms’ seventh Super Bowl; two were with NBC. Quite an impressive track record.

Unfortunately for Simms, Sunday was by far his worst. As I wrote in a post yesterday, I can’t recall another time when the lead analyst in a Super Bowl received such an avalanche of bad reviews. It wasn’t as if all the critics had a conference call and decided what to write. Rather, it was a spontaneous reaction to an analyst who seemed hesitant to speak out during key points of the game.

Regardless of what network officials might say, the negative reaction definitely was heard all the way up to the office of CBS president and CEO Leslie Moonves.

CBS knows it was a bad performance by Simms. The one time you really don’t want to be bad is during a Super Bowl.

If CBS decides to stick with Simms for the 2016 Super Bowl, it creates a problem. His presence will revive all the harsh critiques from Sunday. It will become a storyline for that year’s coverage. Can Simms redeem himself after 2013’s clunker?

“That’s not the story they’ll want,” said a TV insider.

If not Simms, then who? Internally, CBS has two former ABC Monday Night Football analysts on its roster. Boomer Esiason is terrific as a radio analyst for Dial Global Sports. The network could shift him from the studio. Dan Fouts, a Hall of Famer, has received high praise for his work at CBS and on radio for Dial Global.

CBS also could go outside. Who knows? What if Peyton Manning plays two more years and retires at the end of the 2014 season? Boom, CBS swoops in and puts him in the No. 1 seat next to Nantz in time for the 2016 Super Bowl.

Here’s a thought: Don’t discount the possibility of CBS using a three-man booth, with Simms and another analyst for the 2016 game. In fact, I think it is a strong possibility. It would enable the network to transition to a new look in the booth and allow Simms, who will be 61 in 2016, to call one last Super Bowl.

A little history: That’s exactly what NBC did with Simms when he went from player to analyst in the 90s. He teamed with Dick Enberg and Paul Maguire on that network’s No. 1 crew.

Then again, CBS could decide to stick with Simms. Perhaps, the network will determine one bad game doesn’t define a career.

Remember what I said about loyalty.

CBS doesn’t have to decide Simms’ fate today or even for next year. But a decision will have to made at some point.

 

 

 

No record for CBS, but Super Bowl rating hardly left in dark

Get it? I made a pun out of the power outage. By the way, Craig Ferguson is taking full responsibility.

The game didn’t set a viewer record, as it did the previous two years. I’m sure that will spark stories of a drop in ratings and the beginning of football’s downward spiral.

Forget about it. The number still is staggering. And as usual, I’m left with my annual question: What were the other 31 percent of the country watching during the Super Bowl?

From CBS:

The CBS Television Network’s coverage of Super Bowl XLVII featuring the BALTIMORE RAVENS’ 34-31 win over the SAN FRANCISCO 49ers’ on Sunday, Feb 3 (6:32-8:41 and 9:11-10:47 PM, ET) was watched by a Nielsen estimated average of 108.41 million viewers, making it the third most-watched program in television history (Super Bowl XLVI – 111.3 million; Super Bowl XLV – 111.0 million).

CBS Sports’ coverage of Super Bowl XLVII earned an average fast national household rating/share of 46.3/69 (47.0/71; N.Y. Giants-New England; Super Bowl XLVI), making it the second highest-rated Super Bowl in 27 years (1/26/86; 48.3/70; Chicago-New England).

Last night’s Super Bowl HH rating/share peaked at a 50.7/73 with an average of 113.92 million viewers from 10:30-10:47 PM, ET. 

Posted in NFL

My view of Super Sunday: Not so super for Phil Simms; thumbs up for NFL Network

I felt like I played in the game.

That’s what watching all this stuff for a zillion hours does to you. Super Sunday is an all-out assault on the senses that drains your very last brain cell. And that was before the power outage hit.

I’m more of a purist who can do without all the sideshows of the Super Bowl. I’ll take Championship Sunday every time.

Yet having said that, I’m already counting down the days until I see Scott Hanson again on NFL RedZone.

Here’s the good, bad and in between from Super Bowl 47–sorry, too tired to figure out the Roman numerals.

Note: I didn’t see every minute of every pregame show. I even watched the hockey and golf for a few minutes. So if I missed something, well maybe I’ll catch it next year.

Intercepted: I’m not sure why, but Phil Simms really was off his game Sunday. Following John Harbaugh’s decision to go with a fake field goal, Simms came back from commercial and said he wasn’t going to second-guess the coach? Huh? Isn’t that what an analyst does?

The call was begging for more analysis, agree or disagree. You can’t be a network analyst in the Super Bowl, and shy away from weighing in on such a controversial decision. Big blow to Simms’ credibility, as evidenced by the reaction on Twitter.

Throughout much of the first half, Jim Nantz, who had a good night, seemed to be working extra hard to draw out Simms, especially when things got a bit chippy between the two teams. Simms was hesitant.

Simms stepped up a bit in the second half. However, on the key play, he waffled on the no-holding call in the endzone. At one point, he said: “The more I see it, the more confused I get.”

Sort of sums up Simms’ night.

Lights out: So now we know that Steve Tasker is CBS’ official “the lights are out” reporter. The power outage made a mess of things for CBS, considering it also knocked out Nantz’s mic in the booth. CBS gave us the first ever power outage running clock in Super Bowl history. So that was exciting.

It wasn’t the network’s finest moment. Given all the billions the network shells out to the NFL, why didn’t it have an on-air interview with a league official to explain the situation?

Networking: I didn’t watch all of the NFL Network’s 8 1/2 hours of pregame coverage, but I watched a lot of it. The network has put together a solid cast of analysts who have developed a good chemistry. The Hall of Famers/Super Bowl champions were in their element Sunday. Marshall Faulk is vastly underrated, and his feature on his hometown of New Orleans was really strong.

The driver of the show, Rich Eisen, is funny, insightful, and not overbearing, unlike another NFL host on another cable sports network. All in all, a good interesting, informative and entertaining package.

Restrained: CBS was very restrained with its coverage of the Harbaugh brothers. We didn’t see the first reaction shots of the coaches until the beginning of the second quarter. And we barely got any shots of mom and dad, especially down the stretch. If Fox were doing the game, it would be cutting to the brothers and their parents after every play.

Ray Lewis: When it comes to awkward, it’s hard to beat CBS’ coverage of Ray Lewis. His former teammate Shannon Sharpe did the pregame interview. A questionable call, given their relationship, although Sharpe did ask Lewis about the Atlanta murders.

Then in the studio discussion, Boomer Esiason called out Lewis for not disclosing all he knows about the murders. However, the conversation didn’t go anywhere. Eventually, Dan Marino did an awkward segue back to football.

During the game, Nantz mentioned the murders once, and Simms interjected something that added nothing.

Oops: Joe Flacco could be heard saying, “F-ing awesome” immediately after the game. ESPN immediately issued an apology.

Emotional: The most memorable image of Sunday: The kids from Newtown singing America The Beautiful. Nothing comes close. Wonderful, touching moment.

Disaster: A pregame segment featuring Boomer Esiason and Shannon Shannon handing out Pizza Hut pizzas in the French Quarter was, in the words of my 17-year-old, “really stupid.” I’d say beyond stupid. Really, do the networks need the money that badly to have to shill for those products?

Inspirational: Hard to beat Lesley Visser’s feature on O.J. Brigance on Sunday or any day. Truly moving. Right up there was the story on Chuck Pagano and his battle with cancer.

And in the quality department, enjoyed Bill Cowher’s piece on Vernon Davis that featured insights from his former coach Mike Singletary.

Sobering: Andrea Kremer’s compelling feature on Jacksonville receiver Laurent Robinson on NFL Network. Robinson’s wife tells him, “One more concussion and you’re done.” Hard to imagine how he’ll ever play again.

True words: “Five minutes aren’t enough to discuss this,” said Boomer Esiason during a concussion segment on CBS. Right about that, although they could have had a few more minutes if they dumped the Pizza Hut thing.

Still punishing: Jim Brown appeared on NFL Network and was blunt as always on minority coaching hires and the league’s health issue.

Future analyst: Larry Fitzgerald. The Arizona receiver will be in demand after he hangs them up.

No. 4: Brett Favre, sans tie, was a nice addition to NFL Network. Critics might say he wasn’t polished, and he wasn’t. But I still tuned in because it was Favre. And despite the “you knows,” he still had plenty to say. A network job is there if he wants it, but I doubt he does.

Huh?: Looks like Favre doesn’t spend much time on his computer. Says to Eisen, “What’s a podcast?

Drowned out: It’s great to get some flavor of the town by setting up a stage in front of screaming fans. The problem is that it forces the hosts also to scream, which can be annoying. ESPN, and CBS early on, went the outdoor route more often than not. At one point, Suzy Kolber seemed to be yelling just to be heard. I don’t like to be yelled at.

Puppy Love: I would have liked to have heard Chris Berman call the Puppy Bowl for Animal Planet.

And out: I figure all the promos for CBS’ shows (a new record?) will be ringing in my head for weeks. Good thing the Super Bowl only is once a year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hoe many show promos can CBS squeeze into one Super Bowl?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Puppy: I would have liked to have heard Chris Berman on the Puppy Bowl for Animal Planet.

 

 

Pelley interview with Obama was a missed opportunity

For starters, I’m not sure when it became essential to hear from the president on Super Bowl Sunday. I’m all about being informed, but this day is about football, not politics.

What’s next? The Republican response to the presidential interview? Speaking of equal time, perhaps coverage of the president’s State of the Union address should include an interview with the winning Harbaugh brother.

Having said all that, I was disappointed that CBS’ Scott Pelley asked President Obama only one question related to his comments about football. Given what the president said about the dangers of the game, this would have been a good time to expand the discussion.

Mr. President, how do you reconcile enjoying a game that you believe is fundamentally dangerous?

Will the government ever have to step in?

And Pelley could have taken it beyond football, given all the recent news about PEDs involving the biggest stars in sports from Lance Armstrong to Alex Rodriguez. How does the president view sports’ ability to curb abuses of steroids and more?

I understand Pelley wanted the President to address the policy issues. Sports, though, is an important part of this society. It would have been interesting to receive his views on the pressing issues there, too.

If we have to hear from the president on Super Bowl Sunday, let’s remember what the day is all about.

 

 

 

Posted in NFL

What’s the over-under on Harbaugh shots during the Super Bowl?

It’ll be all-Harbaugh-all-the-time Sunday. Except when it’s all-Ray Lewis.

The Harbaugh brothers are an incredible storyline. In Jim Nantz’s view, the best pictures from the Super Bowl will come at the end of the game.

“When those two coaches meet at midfield when the game ends, I can’t wait to see  what that will be like,” Nantz said. “How much joy? How much despair? How will  they balance that? To me, the ultimate shot of this game will be when two  brothers meet at midfield — one a winner, one a loser, with the biggest stakes  in the sport, and it has all just been settled. Looking into their eyes, what  are we going to see?”

As for the game itself, CBS director Mike Arnold said his crew will have dedicated cameras on both coaches. Of course, that’s a no-brainer, considering CBS will have 62 cameras.

The reaction shots from the coaches are standard fare during a Super Bowl. However, there’s going to be much more interest in seeing the Harbaughs because of the brother connection–especially Jim, who can get very animated.

“If he’s got a great reaction, we want to make sure we see that on the air,” Arnold said.

And what about the parents? There will be a high value on the reaction shots from mom and dad.

“If we find them in the stands, we’ll definitely mix them into the broadcast,” said executive producer Harold Bryant.

Meanwhile, the challenge for Nantz and Phil Simms will be to come up with fresh angles to a Harbaugh storyline that will have been beaten to death by kickoff.

Simms:  “I think we have a few stories about both brothers than nobody knows through experiences I’ve had with him or people who know them. Maybe we’ll get into a couple of those, but so many of those stories are dependant on the pace of the game and the plays that are being made. If there’s a lot of exciting plays, it’s hard to tell anything personal about either one. We’ll just deal with the game.”

Nantz: “We’ll be armed with appropriate bullet points. Hopefully very fresh. There’s so much out there right now. This game is so Harbaugh-centric. You just hope you can find in your face-to-face meetings a story people have no heard.”

 

 

Posted in NFL

Sage Enberg advice to Nantz: Less is more at the Super Bowl

Jim Nantz is hardly a kid. At 53, he will be calling his third Super Bowl Sunday for CBS.

Nantz, though, has tremendous reverence for the broadcasters who helped paved the way for him and others. He never misses an opportunity to learn from the great ones.

Last week in San Diego, Nantz had dinner with Dick Enberg. Now 78, the broadcast legend called eight Super Bowls for NBC.

Nantz said Enberg gave him some advice on calling the big game.

“He told the story of doing the Super Bowl in 1983,” Nantz said. “He (and analyst Merlin Olsen) were getting feedback in their headsets the whole first quarter. He couldn’t get to the third or fourth word before it was coming back. It created confusion for them. So they talked in that first quarter in short. clipped phrases.

“Eventually, the problem was fixed, but they walked out of the booth at game’s end all upset because they felt like they got off to a rough start in the first quarter.

“They went back to a party they were hosting after the game. Everyone said, ‘You guys never sounded better. That first quarter was amazing. Everything was just jumping off the screen. The energy, it was awesome the way you guys played against that crowd noise.’

“Dick passed that on to me as a teaching point. It’s one of those games where the old phrase, ‘less is more’ is probably very appropriate.”

CBS Sports Chairman Sean McManus then chimed in, “So Jim, we’ve made a note for our audio team. Put feedback in Jim’s headset.”

Nantz added: “In a Super Bowl broadcast, you do the things you’ve always done. We are there to do a football game. Often we don’t have the luxury of going to even a second or third sentence. It’s highlights and on to the next play.”

 

 

Posted in NFL

Favre to join NFL Network studio crew Sunday; Does this signal possible comeback–as an analyst?

Remember the good old days when the daily Brett Favre updates entertained us before Tebow mania?

Well, Brett’s back. Sort of.

This is an interesting get for NFL Network (details below). Besides those Wrangler ads (“Nice job, Dale”), we haven’t seen much of the Brettster since he finally couldn’t play anymore after the 2010 season. I’ll check him out Sunday.

The NFL Network likely got Favre for Sunday since he lives near New Orleans. Doubt you’ll see him at next year’s Super Bowl in New York.

Then again, maybe Favre wants to try out this analyst thing. Perhaps he’s tired of hunting and playing golf in Mississippi? The networks would fall over themselves to get him.

Yes, more Brett Favre speculation.

Here’s the info for Sunday from the NFL Network:

Twenty-year NFL veteran and three-time league MVP, Brett Favre will join NFL Network’s 8.5-hour edition of NFL GameDay Morning (Sunday, 9:00 AM ET) live from the Mercedes-Benz Superdome prior to Super Bowl XLVII.

Favre will join host Rich Eisen along with his former coach Steve Mariucci, and Super Bowl champions Marshall Faulk, Kurt Warner, Warren Sapp, Michael Irvin, Deion Sanders and Brian Billick to discuss his thoughts on the 2012 NFL season, the Super Bowl XLVII matchup, and his life away from the field.

In 1997, Favre led the Green Bay Packers to a 35-21 win over the New England Patriots in Super Bowl XXXI in game played at the Mercedes-Benz Superdome, the same field where Favre will provide analysis prior Super Bowl XLVII between the San Francisco 49ers and Baltimore Ravens.

Favre’s appearance on NFL GameDay Morning is part of NFL Network’s more than 140 total hours – 85 live – of programming from 11 sets across New Orleans featuring a roster of 35 on-air personalities with a combined 17 Super Bowl rings. Super Bowl XLVII is the 10th Super Bowl NFL Network has covered since the network was started in 2003.

 “There aren’t too many retired athletes who continue to attract the attention and draw that Brett Favre does, and NFL Network is thrilled to have him on NFL GameDay Morning leading up to Super Bowl XLVII,” said Eric Weinberger, Executive Producer of NFL Network. “Surrounded by a former mentor in Steve Mariucci and players he competed against over the years such as Deion Sanders and Warren Sapp, and from the field where he guided the Packers to a victory in Super Bowl XXXI, Brett should give our viewers some unique insight and analysis into the game and his life away from the field.”

 

Posted in NFL

Costas to Jon Stewart: There may be something irreconcilable and unreformable about football

I stayed up late last night (at least late for me) when I heard Bob Costas would appear on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. With the Super Bowl coming up Sunday, I looked forward to what Costas would have to say about football and the game.

However, in the segment that aired on the show, Stewart spent the entire time discussing Costas’ halftime commentary on the gun issue. Even though Costas gave reasoned answers, I’m sure the gun community was incensed. Not that the gun community watches Jon Stewart.

However, I was disappointed since Costas’ gun stance is old territory for me. I wanted to hear him talk about sports. Time, though, ran out, and Stewart said to check the Daily Show site for more of his interview with Costas. Sorry Jon, but I’m going to bed.

I did check the site this morning and saw Costas did give some pointed views about the future of football. At one point, he even mocked the NFL’s health and safety ads, saying, “In the mean time, half of us won’t remember what the day of the week it is by the time we’re 45.”

Even though his network, NBC, has committed billions in right fees to the NFL, Costas is to be commended for going strong on the largest issue facing the sport. Check out what he has to say.

In this clip, Costas recalls the humanity of Stan Musial.

Posted in NFL