Not just money: NFL want big-game feel of Nantz-Simms for Thursday night

In the process of working on a golf-related story on Jim Nantz, I talked to CBS Sports Chairman Sean McManus. Last night, I realized there is a McManus quote about Nantz in the piece that gets to a big part of CBS’ new deal with the NFL for the new Thursday night package.

“If you turn on the TV and hear his voice, you know it is a big event if Jim Nantz is doing it.” McManus said.

Indeed, the $250 million or so for the package is nice, but the NFL sought more. It wants a big-game feel to these Thursday night games.

Not to knock Brad Nessler, the previous voice of Thursday night football on NFL Network, and one of the best in the business, but he doesn’t do Super Bowls. Analyst Mike Mayock never was a Super Bowl MVP.

Nantz does Super Bowls. His analyst, Phil Simms, was a Super Bowl MVP.

Together, they call the biggest NFL games for CBS. The NFL believes their presence will elevate the Thursday night games to another level.

It is telling that Nantz and Simms, along with the CBS production crew, will call the entire Thursday night slate, and not just the eight games on CBS. Some of the reason, undoubtedly, has to do with continuity and the difficulty of a new broadcast team starting at mid-season. However, make no mistake, the league wants the the big-game feel of a Nantz-Simms telecast to carry over for the six Thursday night games (plus a Saturday night game) on NFL Network.

The NFL wants to make Thursday night into a showcase, putting it on the same level as Sunday and Monday night games. In order to do that, the league felt it needed an A-team crew. That’s what the NFL is getting in Nantz and Simms.

******

The new Thursday night schedule will mean an incredibly busy fall for Nantz and Simms. However, McManus said they will have several Sundays off, presumably on CBS’ single-header weeks.

So who gets CBS’ No. 1 game on those days? Following the retirement of Dan Dierdorf from the Greg Gumbel No. 2 team, don’t be surprised if Ian Eagle and Dan Fouts get those top games. They have received high critical praise for their strong work.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in NFL

Will quality of Thursday night games get significant upgrade on CBS?

So what kind of games will CBS be getting with its new Thursday night package?

One thing is for sure, any Thursday night game featuring Jacksonville will be on NFL Network.

You would have to figure the A games definitely will be on CBS. It wouldn’t be a surprise if the NFL gave the network a significant upgrade over last year’s Thursday games on NFL Network. Probably not to the level of what NBC gets on Sunday night, but close to ESPN’s for Monday night.

After all, if you want to make Thursday night a big night for football, the match-ups need to be there.

The 2013 NFL Network package included possible CBS-caliber games:

San Diego Chargers at Denver Broncos (Week 15)

Kansas City Chiefs at Philadelphia Eagles (Week 3)

Cincinnati Bengals at Miami Dolphins (Week 9)

Seattle Seahawks at Arizona Cardinals (Week 7)

Games with big market appeal:

New York Giants at Chicago Bears (Week 6)

New York Jets at New England Patriots (Week 2)

Two games that looked great at beginning of season, but didn’t pan out:

New Orleans Saints at Atlanta Falcons (Week 12)

Washington Redskins at Minnesota Vikings (Week 10)

So-so games:

San Francisco 49ers at St. Louis Rams (Week 4)

Indianapolis Colts at Tennessee Titans (Week 11)

Carolina Panthers at Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Week 8)

And no way will they be on CBS:

Buffalo Bills at Cleveland Browns (Week 5)

Houston Texans at Jacksonville Jaguars (Week 14)

Posted in NFL

Blindsided: Peyton Manning could have used protection of a Buick Verano Sunday

Peyton Manning’s latest commercial for the Buick Verano takes on a different meaning after Sunday’s disaster.

His opening line: “As a quarterback, I know how it feels to be blindsided.” Right about that. Maybe things would have different if Manning had a Buick Verano blocking for him.

Below is an extended version about the making of the ad. Here’s a link to the ad itself.

Indeed, in light of Manning’s epic failure, it does your perspective a bit in watching on his ads. The Papa John’s guy couldn’t be pleased.

It will be interesting to see if Manning’s upcoming ads acknowledge that he is trying to bounce back from the humbling defeat.

 

 

Posted in NFL

Move over Peyton: It’s Russell Wilson’s world now; Charismatic QB will be in much demand

OK, perhaps it is a bit abrupt to write off Peyton Manning.

However, there’s little question that Russell Wilson will be the big winner of the Super Bowl–off the field that is. Here is a clip from his appearance with David Letterman last night.

Wilson is charismatic, well spoken, and now a Super Bowl winning QB.. American Family Insurance has to feel like it got on the ground floor with Wilson.

Other companies now will be swarming all over Wilson. And it is certain that a broadcast career awaits him when he retires, perhaps in 2030.

To the victors, go the endorsements.

Posted in NFL

Imagine rating for good game: Blowout still pulls in largest audience in TV history

Yeah, it really doesn’t matter if the game is close or a blowout. People still tune in.

I think the rating would have been a few ticks higher for a close game. But by and large, viewers stayed to watch Seattle’s dominance and Denver’s incompetence.

Really says something about the power of the Super Bowl.

From Fox Sports:

*******

New York – The Seattle Seahawks dominant performance in Super Bowl XLVIII, defeating the Denver Broncos 43-8, the largest margin of victory in a Super Bowl in 21 years, was watched by an average audience of 111.5 million people, more than any television program in U.S. history, surpassing the previous mark of 111.3 million set by a much more closely contested Super Bowl XLVI (New York Giants-New England Patriots) on NBC.  The game is also now the most-watched program ever on FOX, breaking the 111.0 million viewer mark the network set for Super Bowl XLV (Green Bay Packers-Pittsburgh Steelers).  Three of the last four Super Bowls set average viewership records.

Super Bowl XLVIII posted a 46.4/69, matching the household rating and share for Super Bowl XLVII (Baltimore-San Francisco) a year ago, according to fast national figures issued today by Nielsen, and both, along with Super Bowl XVIII and XIX tie, as the seventh highest-rated Super Bowls ever.

Interest in the game, the first Super Bowl ever played in an outdoor, cold-weather location, and the nation’s No. 1 media market, was unprecedented.  The rating at kickoff, 44.5/70, ranks as the highest on record, and +12% over the kickoff rating a year ago, suggesting that a more competitive game would have resulted in even higher viewership.  Ratings climbed through the first half and peaked at a 47.9/71 from 7:30-8:00 PM ET as Seattle established a commanding 22-0 halftime lead.  Viewership remained impressively high through the fourth quarter despite the fact that Seattle had the game well in hand.  The game earned a 44.0/63 from 9:30-conclusion, meaning that even in the closing minutes the rating was only 5% lower than it was for the entire game.

The record-breaking trend also extended to the PEPSI SUPER BOWL XLVIII HALFTIME SHOW, with 115.3 million viewers watching Bruno Mars and the Red Hot Chili Peppers perform. That figure surpasses the 110.8 million delivered by Beyonce last year and the prior record of 114.0 million set by Madonna two years ago.

Live coverage of Super Bowl XLVIII was also available in the U.S. on a Spanish language channel, FOX Deportes, for the first time ever and on digital platforms via FOX Sports GO and FOXSports.com. FOX Deportes averaged 561,000 viewers, the most-watched non-soccer sports event in Spanish cable history. The live stream averaged 528,000 viewers to become the most-watched live stream of a single sports event in history. The contributions of FOX Deportes and the new media outlets raise total viewing of the Super Bowl on an average minute basis to 112.6 million viewers. (Streaming information reported by Adobe Analytics.)

Locally, Kansas City led all markets with a 58.1/78, followed by Seattle (56.7/92, the market’s best Super Bowl performance ever), Indianapolis (53.9/74), New Orleans (53.2/72), Tulsa (52.9/71), Las Vegas (52.5/75), Portland (52.4/82), Knoxville (52.3/68), Jacksonville (52.0/68) while Denver (51.4/83) and Tampa (51.4/71) round out the Top 10.  Host market New York delivered a 50.5, its best Super Bowl rating since 1987 (Super Bowl XXI: Giants vs. Broncos, 53.4).

The SUPER BOWL PREGAME SHOW rose to a 12-year high by averaging a 12.0/22 and 23.1 million viewers from 2:00 PM to kickoff (6:33 PM ET).  Yesterday’s 12.0/22 is a +20% improvement over last year’s 10.0/20 for CBS’s Super Bowl pregame, and pregame viewing peaked at a 31.1/52 and 68.4 million viewers from 6:00 PM ET to kickoff.

Super Bowl XLVIII Sunday goes down as one of the biggest nights of prime time in FOX history. FOX’s prime time (7:00 – 11:00 PM ET) averaged 94.6 million viewers, the second most-watched night in FOX’s 27-year history (2/6/11, the night of Super Bowl XLV, 100.9 million viewers).  In addition to the Super Bowl itself, FOX got powerful performances from the Super Bowl post-game show (65.4 million) NEW GIRL (25.8 million) and BROOKLYN NINE-NINE (14.8 million).  FOX Research now projects that when final Sunday numbers for all networks become available tomorrow, FOX will leap past NBC to take over the top spot in the 2013-14 Adults 18-49 ratings race season to date.  FOX is projected to average a 2.9 for the season-to-date in Adults 18-49 to NBC’s 2.8.

Social media was ablaze before, during and after Super Bowl XLVIII with 25.3 million total tweets composed by 5.6 million authors.  The most active moments during the game were Percy Harvin’s kickoff return for a touchdown to start the second half (429,000 tweets), the conclusion of the Bruno Mars/Red Hot Chili Peppers halftime performance (424,000) and MVP Malcolm Smith’s interception return for a touchdown (300,000). Following the game, activity about the Super Bowl peaked at over 500,000 tweets shortly after 10:00 PM ET.

 

Posted in NFL

Not so Super Sunday: Move on America, nothing more to see here

Got to figure this was Roger Goodell’s deal with the devil: The NFL avoids a weather nightmare with temperatures in the 50s at kickoff. In return, the devil sticks the league with a terrible game.

Peyton Manning’s four-hour disaster also made for a long night for Fox, which had to pull out the blowout filler material right after Percy Harvin’s touchdown to open the second half.

All I can say is when Denver loses a Super Bowl, they do it in a big way; the combined score in its five losses is 206-58.

The game literally was over after the first play. As a result, the entire evening was one big buzz kill for everyone not living in Seattle. And that goes for the commercials too.

Here are a few of my observations:

Apologist: While I’m sure other people did–they always do–I didn’t have any problem with Joe Buck-Troy Aikman call. Like everyone else, they were stunned by the rout. Aikman appropriately blitzed the Broncos for playing as if they were wearing weighted shoes. That has to be the reason why they looked so slow and sloppy.

My biggest issue with Aikman came late in the game. Perhaps channeling his inner-QB, he insisted this loss wouldn’t damage Manning’s legacy and that he still would be considered a top 5 QB of all time. Not so sure about that one, Troy. The stink from this game is going to follow Manning for a long time.

Still Joe: Speaking of great QBs, 45 years after he guaranteed a victory in Super Bowl III, Joe Namath was trending on Twitter. Quite a fur coat. Too bad he wore it on a night where a golf pullover would have sufficed.

TB: Fox NFL Sunday faced a difficult challenge in having to do the pregame show without Terry Bradshaw. He was with his family following the death of his father, Bill, Thursday. In a nice touch, Curt Menefee said the Fox crew dedicated the game to Bradshaw’s father.

Bradshaw’s buddies definitely missed him. The show lacked his energy and zaniness. His absence shows Fox will have big shoes to fill once TB decides to retire.

Enough: I did an entire post on why it is time to eliminate the president interview during the pregame show.

More: I also did a post on Frank Caliendo’s Super Bowl bit on ESPN. Forget the commercials, it was the funniest thing you saw all day.

Celebrity interviews: What a coincidence, stars of Fox shows just happen to be at the Super Bowl. For me, any time I saw a celebrity interview, it was my cue to turn to NFL Network. I hardly think I was alone.

NFL Network: Speaking of the league-owned network, I really like what they do. Rich Eisen does a terrific job of directing the traffic, and the panel carries the weight of NFL Hall of Fame pedigree. Plus, they are entertaining.

He’s right: Jimmy Johnson kept saying that a healthy Percy Harvin would be a big factor in the game with his speed. He was right. Imagine if the Seahawks had a healthy Harvin all year.

Randy Moss: He continues to be impressive as an analyst. He will be promoted to the first team sooner than later.

Lockerroom culture: Solid piece by Andrea Kremer on the culture in NFL locker rooms in the wake of Martin-Incognito controversy. Here is the link.

Quiet man: OK, I get it. Marshawn Lynch doesn’t like to talk to the media.

Favre watch: Apparently, Brett Favre couldn’t be bothered with flying to New York to be part of NFL Network’s pregame show. So they had him on via remote, perhaps from some mountain cabin judging by his epic beard. If I’m Gillette, I’m contacting Favre tomorrow.

The segment did have one funny moment when Favre was asked what advice he had for Manning about retiring. “I’m not sure I’m the best person to ask that question,” he said.

Halftime: After a run of old-timers like The Who, Rolling Stones, and Springsteen, it appears if the NFL is done with performers who can qualify for Medicare. Bruno Mars and Red Hot Chili Pepper tried to revive an audience after the 22-0 first half.

And was that really Jerry, George and “Hello, Newman” back at the diner? Never gets old.

Pat Summerall: Joe Buck remembered their old Fox colleague with a nice tribute.

Ad time: The blowout probably didn’t help the advertisers who spent big bucks on the game. Viewers aren’t as engaged, especially in the fourth quarter.

The number of poor ads continues to be astounding. Aren’t the best people in advertising working on them? Someone put in a call to Don Draper.

I really like the Tim Tebow ads for T-Mobile. The 80s’ flashback ad for Radio Shack was well done.

However, I tend to go for things that are simple and cleaver, not over-the-top production and contrived. That’s why my favorite ad was the one for Cheerios.

That’s all: For now, folks. Football is done. At least until the combine, and then the draft….

 

Posted in NFL

Please: Time to eliminate president interview during Super Bowl

The most dishonest thing I heard Sunday came from President Obama when he said to Bill O’Reilly: “Great to be with you.”

Pretty sure O’Reilly was as welcome at the White House as a stomach virus.

I’m here to say, enough is enough. Time to do away with the president interview during the Super Bowl pregame show.

This isn’t about politics. I felt the same way about the presidential interview with George Bush as I do with Obama in the Oval Office.

During Fox’s pregame show Sunday, O’Reilly went at Obama with the same fervor as  Seattle’s defense against Peyton Manning. O’Reilly’s pursuit of the truth, if you want to call it that, would have been fine if the program was the O’Reilly Factor.

But it wasn’t. This interview occurred during a program that celebrates the biggest sporting day of the year in America.

How out of place was Obama’s interview? The previous segment was a song by Phillip Phillips.

C’mon. It makes as much sense as inserting a LeBron James interview during a political convention.

To those who say the Super Bowl provides a large platform for a presidential interview, well, so does the Oscars, which pulled in 40 million viewers last year. Since ABC does that telecast, let’s have Diane Sawyer interview the president just after one of the big musical numbers.

Of course, we have Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, and a slew of other outlets for 24/7 coverage of the president. Do we really have to be subjected to a political rumble during the Super Bowl?

Also, if you insist on having the president appear during a Super Bowl, wouldn’t you at least ask him some football questions? Seems like getting Obama’s views about the concussion issue would be fairly timely.

It is NBC’s turn to do the Super Bowl next year. If the president’s PR machine was smart, tell him to pull a Marshawn Lynch and say he’s not talking.

The only way the president should be part of Super Bowl Sunday is if he has inside information about the game.

 

 

 

 

 

Did Charley Haley’s treatment of media keep him out of Hall again? Aikman slams process

Update: I added comment below from Scott Michaux of the Augusta Chronicle, who did not enjoy covering Haley.

********

It looks as if some football reporters are continuing to get their revenge on Charles Haley.

For the fifth time, Haley failed to get into the Hall of Fame Saturday. This is the same Haley who treated the writers like absolute jerks while playing for Dallas and San Francisco.

Thursday, I did a post with Leonard Shapiro, the former Washington Post NFL writer who was a long-time HOF voter. I wrote:

“He was surely, mean, arrogant. A rotten man,” said Shapiro, who was a long-time football writer for the Washington Post. “I thought he was despicable and a discredit to the game.”

Shapiro never voted for Haley during the 29 years he served on the committee. When asked to assess Haley as a player, “He’s in the hall of great. Whether he’s a Hall of Famer is debatable.”

Would Haley already be in the Hall of Fame if he was a good guy to the media? He definitely would have a better chance.

Shapiro said there are plenty of voters in the selection room who feel the same way he does about Haley’s treatment of the media.

“Are there guys in the room who think, ‘What an asshole, I’m not going to vote for that guy,’” Shapiro said. “You’re damn right there are guys who think like that.”

Haley clearly isn’t a slam-dunk Hall of Famer. However, it appears as if he isn’t going to get the benefit of the doubt from football reporters required to put him in the Hall.

In David Moore’s story in the Dallas Morning News, Troy Aikman knocked the process. Moore writes:

Haley’s abusive behavior during his playing days won few friends in the media.

Aikman has the same questions.

“I don’t like the process,” said the quarterback who joined the Hall in 2006 in his first year of eligibility. “I don’t like the way that it’s done.

“I do believe he should be in the Hall of Fame. I’ve said that. I’m biased because I watched him every weekend. I’m amazed that he’s not in the Hall of Fame.

“I’m sorry, but if him being rude to some writers or not being accommodating to those in the media keeps him from being in the Hall of Fame, then I really disagree with the process, because that’s not what this is about. I don’t know what happens, but I know he was largely responsible for a big amount of the success that we had during those years.”

You know what they say? What goes around comes around.

*******

From Michaux:

He was not merely “rude” to the media. He was hateful and treated media (and others) as if they were beneath him. I say this as a rookie writer during his prime who tried (and failed) to cover him and share his successes with the folks he grew up with at his hometown newspaper.

The Hall of Fame should require more than just skill between the lines. Being a Hall of Famer should require some measure of human decency, even from football players asked to put that aside 60 minutes a week. You don’t have to be accommodating or quotable or even nice. You just have to treat people with respect if you want to ultimately be respected in the end.

The HoF process certainly has its flaws, but holding people accountable for ALL of their actions as representatives of the NFL isn’t one of them.

 

 

Will Charles Haley’s bad guy act with media keep him out of Hall of Fame?

Earlier today, I posted an interview with Leonard Shapiro on the voting process for the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Here’s more from the former long-time voter on the human element and how it might keep Charles Haley out on Canton.

********

Unlike baseball, where character is a consideration for enshrinement in Cooperstown, Shapiro says the football voters are only supposed “to care about what happens between the lines.”

But Charles Haley could be a case in point of why it doesn’t always work that way.

Haley will be a finalist for the fifth time Saturday. He was a pass rush dynamo who played on five Super Bowl winners for Dallas and San Francisco.

And he was a complete jerk to the media.

“He was surely, mean, arrogant. A rotten man,” said Shapiro, who was a long-time football writer for the Washington Post. “I thought he was despicable and a discredit to the game.”

Shapiro never voted for Haley during the 29 years he served on the committee. When asked to assess Haley as a player, “He’s in the hall of great. Whether he’s a Hall of Famer is debatable.”

Would Haley already be in the Hall of Fame if he was a good guy to the media? He definitely would have a better chance.

Shapiro said there are plenty of voters in the selection room who feel the same way he does about Haley’s treatment of the media.

“Are there guys in the room who think, ‘What an asshole, I’m not going to vote for that guy,'” Shapiro said. “You’re damn right there are guys who think like that.”

This situation isn’t unique to Haley. Shapiro said the character issue almost kept Lawrence Taylor from being a first-ballot Hall of Famer. It should have been a slam dunk, as Taylor might have been the greatest defensive player in NFL history. At the very least, he’s in the top 5.

“It got very heated over Taylor,” Shapiro said. “He had a history of drug problems and other issues. He wasn’t the world’s great citizen. The voters aren’t supposed to take the character issue into account, but it did factor in for LT. One guy said, ‘I don’t care, I’m not going to vote for him.'”

Taylor did get in. There’s no way they could keep him out.

Haley, though, is a different story, as his credentials aren’t as clear cut. Shapiro isn’t so sure the fifth time will be the charm for him.

“There is human nature involved,” Shapiro said. “(As much as it isn’t supposed to be that way), you can’t take that part out of it.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inside selection room: Former voter on why there won’t be any Deadspin controversies coming out Pro Football HOF process

My latest column for the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana University provides a glimpse into what will take place during the Pro Football Hall of Fame selection meeting Saturday. While the process isn’t perfect, it is much better than what occurs in baseball.

From the column:

***********

The 2014 Pro Football Hall of Fame class will be unveiled Saturday. Here are some things you won’t be hearing about the selection process.

*Griping that many voters haven’t covered a game in years and aren’t qualified to vote.

*Outrage over the NFL’s equivalent of Jacque Jones, a marginal player, getting a HOF vote.

*Refusal of voters to give a nod to players linked to steroids.

*A disgruntled selector allowing fans to determine his vote via Deadspin.

Nope, unlike their baseball counterparts, the NFL selection process isn’t likely to create headlines this weekend. However, like everything else, it hardly is perfect.

Leonard Shapiro was part of the NFL HOF selection committee for 29 years. Now on the outside, the former Washington Post football writer sheds some light on his experience.

“It’s a fascinating process,” Shapiro said. “When I came out of the meetings, I felt a combination of exhilarated and ticked off. It was frustrating when qualified players didn’t get in. Yet it felt satisfying to help get some good people in there.”

The process works this way. A preliminary list of 150 candidates is whittled down to 15 finalists. Then on the Saturday prior to the Super Bowl, there is a meeting where a special panel of football reporters debate and then vote for the eventual entrants into the Hall of Fame.

This year, there are 46 people on the committee; one representative from each city in the NFL along with at-large experts like ESPN’s John Clayton and Sports Illustrated’s Peter King.

Therein lies a big difference between baseball, which had 575 voters for the Hall of Fame this year, and some with questionable credentials. That isn’t the case with the NFL, where Shapiro says the voters have at least 15 years on the beat. And they currently are active in covering the sport.

“It’s a really, really good group of people,” Shapiro said.

During the meeting, the person from the finalist’s city makes a 2-3 minute presentation to the group. Then the panel discusses whether the player did enough to merit being in Canton.

Again, another big difference from baseball. Shapiro said the debates did impact his opinions, one way or another.

“In baseball, you get a ballot, and boom, they vote. There’s no discussion,” Shapiro said. “Here, it’s a free and open discussion. You’re supposed to be honest. If a guy in Seattle saw a player 16 times a year compared someone else who saw him only one or two times, that’s a great help. There were times when I thought a player was a dead-solid cinch, and other people would talk about him, and I’d say, ‘I never thought about that.’ It made you think.”

*******

Here’s the link with more, including Shapiro’s concerns about a lack of transparency in the process.