U.S. Open: Fox will need thick skin to handle reaction from finicky golf viewers

An excerpt from my latest Chicago Tribune column:

******

A prediction on Fox Sports’ coverage of its first U.S. Open:

It won’t matter if Fox produces the best Open ever. Golf fans still will complain about a lack of quality. They always complain.

This isn’t to say that Fox’s debut on major championship golf will be a disaster, although it could be. Rather, it is about the realities of a very finicky golf audience that typically isn’t receptive to change.

“Anytime something is new, some people will like it and some people won’t,” said Mark Loomis, Fox Sports’ producer for golf.

After 20 years of the U.S. Open on NBC, there will be an adjustment period to a new lineup of voices. Joe Buck and Greg Norman will be the focal points as the lead announce team. Other analysts include Tom Weiskopf, Corey Pavin, Brad Faxon and Juli Inkster.

Buck will have to prove he can navigate through a golf tournament like long-time standards Jim Nantz and Dan Hicks. If he can’t capture a cadence and tone that is much different than a baseball and football game, he will feel the wrath of golf viewers. Just ask Chris Berman, who was vilified for being out-of-place with his work for the U.S. Open on ESPN.

“Believe me, with play-by-play here, I’m going with a less-is-more approach,” Buck said.

Norman, meanwhile, will be compared to the blunt Johnny Miller, who sees no sacred cows on the course. Even though Norman often was on the receiving end of a Miller critique, he says he is a fan of the NBC analyst.

“When you are in the seat of lead analyst, you have to give your opinion,” Norman said. “It can’t be sugar-coated. It irks me when I watch TV and every player hits the perfect shot and every player is the greatest short game player in the world and every player is just so good. When you look at it in totality, these players are the best in the world, but when they do do something wrong, it’s got to be pointed out.”

 

Blackhawks TV dynasty: Chicago accounts for 30 percent of NBC national rating for Game 6

The Blackhawks are the undisputed ratings kings of hockey. In fact, the Chicago rating for Game 6 likely set a record with the most households watching in one market.

NBC Sports Chairman Mark Lazarus said the team is unique in another way: No other market in sports makes up a larger percentage of the overall national rating than Chicago does for Blackhawks games.

The numbers tell the story again. The Blackhawks’ third Stanley Cup clincher did a 41 rating on WMAQ-Ch. 5; 1 local ratings point is worth nearly 35,000 homes. That means an estimated 1.43 million homes in the Chicago area were tuned into their 2-0 victory.

The 41 rating was the highest ever for a Blackhawks game in Chicago. The previous high was a 32.8 rating for Game 6 of the 2010 series when they won their first Stanley Cup.

To put it in further perspective: the 41 rating is comparable to the Chicago rating for a non-Bears Super Bowl.

NBC officials couldn’t confirm, but the data strongly suggests that no other single market has ever generated 1.43 million homes for a hockey game. Boston and Pittsburgh have produced higher local rating numbers for games, but their markets (Boston is seventh with 2.4 million homes and Pittsburgh is 22d with 1.17 million homes) aren’t nearly as big as Chicago, the nation’s third largest Nielsen market with 3.47 million homes.

The highest-rated hockey game in New York, the nation’s No. 1 market at 7.4 million homes, is believed to be the Rangers’ Stanley Cup winner in Game 7 in 1994, which was seen in an estimated 1.1 million homes in that area.

As for the national number, the game did a 4.4 rating on NBC. The Chicago market accounted for 30 percent of the estimated 4.6 million homes watching the telecast.

That’s a fairly typical chunk for a big Blackhawks game. Lazarus couldn’t think of another market generating a comparable percentage of the national rating in any sports telecast.

“Boston does well for the Bruins, but I’d have to say it is Chicago,” Lazarus said.

The combination of the large Chicago market and passionate following has been ratings gold for NBC.  The 2015 Stanley Cup Final averaged 5.55 million viewers and a 3.19 rating across NBC and NBCSN, making it the second-most watch Final since 1994. Naturally, the first involved the Blackhawks: the 2013 Final against Boston averaged 5.75 million viewers.

“Any time there’s a team that has dominance, it creates a national following,” Lazarus said. “It helps the whole game. Chicago has done that. It’s been terrific.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

Front pages: All hail Blackhawks dynasty in Chicago

I have been able to do some cool things as a sportswriter, but being in the United Center ice during a Stanley Cup celebration ranks right up there.

As a Chicago kid who grew up on Bobby Hull, Stan Mikita and Tony Esposito, it is incredible to see how this team has taken over Chicago, producing new fans for generations to come.

Congratulations and thank you, Blackhawks.

Emrick, Breen at center of ‘golden age’ of NHL, NBA announcers

My latest column for the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana:

********

The NBA Finals and Stanley Cup Final have been such a treat, and it goes beyond LeBron James and Stephen Curry and the excruciatingly-tight Chicago-Tampa Bay series. This is about the men calling the games.

In case you didn’t realize it, we are in the midst of a true golden age of broadcasting for the NHL and NBA. Years from now when a new generation of announcers takes over, a father will say to his son, “Yeah, but you should have heard Mike Emrick and Mike Breen.”

On alternating nights during the finals, there is Emrick’s voice moving at the speed and precision of an Indy car, matching the fast pace of hockey with brilliant eloquence. On the next night, there is the silky-smooth Breen, punctuating the big moments with just the right notes.

This is a gift, friends. A real gift.

I loved this opening by Tom Jones of the Tampa Times in a column about Emrick:

“If you’re lucky, you have tickets to the Stanley Cup final. But if you’re really lucky, you don’t have tickets to the Stanley Cup final. That way you can listen to NBC’s Mike “Doc” Emrick call these games between the Lightning and Blackhawks. Emrick is the Wayne Gretzky of hockey broadcasters. Best of all time. It’s not even close.”

It says something about Emrick’s talents that he has won three Sports Emmys as the best play-by-play man for calling a sport that doesn’t match the ratings of football, basketball and baseball. He remains a master of description, using a myriad of verbs and phrases that further enhance the picture we already see on TV.

I wrote a column for Poynter on what aspiring journalists and broadcasters—established ones, too, for that matter—could learn from Emrick. We discussed the importance of storytelling, a signature element in Emrick’s work.

“I usually have five minutes of material that I have to whack down to 20 seconds,” Emrick said. “But I think the stories are the most lasting. When I listen to someone speak, usually once a week on Sunday, it is the stories that I remember. The stories are far greater than statistics. Stats are here today, gone tomorrow. I remember stories from 20-25 years ago.”

Breen, meanwhile, flies a bit more under the radar compared to other No. 1 announcers. Fans might be surprised to learn that he set a record this year by calling his 10th NBA Finals. Dick Stockton and Marv Albert shared the old mark at nine.

In a story by Brian Mahoney of the Associated Press, Breen says he still considers Albert the voice of the NBA. Perhaps Breen does get eclipsed by Albert, who still is going strong for TNT. Yet Breen deserves his due as one of the best in the business.

Breen’s style is to fit in seamlessly with the game he is calling. He complements the telecast, knowing exactly how to set up his quirky partner, Jeff Van Gundy, and the steady Mark Jackson. He also will interject the pointed comment or criticism when warrant. When the big moment comes, as it often does, Breen rises to the occasion and delivers.

Breen said his approach is to keep it simple. “I just try and work hard and make sure I’m really prepared every time I go on the air and really sounds like there’s no place I’d rather be than calling that particular game,” he said in the AP story.

 

Jason Whitlock needs to explain why he is no longer head of ‘Undefeated’

I’m pretty sure if there was an announcement that the world was about to end, it would occur on a Friday afternoon in the hopes nobody would notice.

ESPN executed the perfect Friday afternoon news dump when it disclosed that Jason Whitlock is out as the head of “The Undefeated” just weeks before its launch.

Clearly, something happened to knock out Whitlock from the African-American-based site that was conceived with him as the standard bearer. I have a hard time believing the release’s statement that ESPN and Whitlock “collectively decided to make some structural adjustments that will maximize the skill sets and strengths of our team, leading to the best possible output for the site and for all of ESPN.”

I’m not buying that notion that Whitlock took one for the team. This is a major embarrassment for someone of his stature, not to mention ego.

Greg Howard’s massive takedown of Whitlock on Deadspin was damning to say the least. Yet that story was published on April 27.

ESPN didn’t make a move back then. In fact, it seemed all systems appeared to be go when Tom Hoffarth of the Los Angeles Daily News wrote a big piece on Whitlock and the site on May 30.

The story contains this passage:

His riposte appears to be transparency. As the editor-in-chief and full-frontal embodiment of this project de rigueur, conceived two years ago and perhaps ready to officially launch next month, when have you ever known Whitlock to play coy about something that’s got his name stamped on it?

“What we’re doing is, to me, one of the most difficult things in journalism,” the 48-year-old said this week from the province he has occupied since last September. “We’re going to be debating and discussing and analyzing race and culture. That’s a high-risk, high-reward endeavor. It requires very smart people. This isn’t going to be about writing game stories or ‘hot takes.’ It’s about actual journalism and reporting on really big issues.

 “And one thing I’ve learned in my short time as a manager and executive is hire really slow and deliberately.”

Apparently, Whitlock didn’t learn all his lessons in being an effective manager. Otherwise, he still would be running the show.

If this situation involved a coach or a general manager being ousted so close to the start of the season, Whitlock would demand an explanation for all involved. He wouldn’t settle for a press release on a Friday afternoon.

The same now holds true for Whitlock. When he writes again, he can’t do a standard sports column.

He needs to explain what happened and why he won’t be the head of “The Undefeated.” If Whitlock is all for transparency in his reporting, that has to include him.

I’m looking forward to reading that column.

 

 

 

Sports media Friday: Views on playoff beards; the 89-year-old announcer who inspired Emrick; HBO strategy on documentaries

Spanning the globe to bring you the constant variety of sports media:

Rick Telander of the Chicago Sun-Times thinks it is time for the playoff beards to go.

Yes, the Islanders won four Cups during that period, but have you heard from them lately? Plus, former Islanders defenseman Denis Potvin has been quoted as saying none of the hirsuteness was
by design.

‘‘It was just something that kind of happened,’’ he said.

None of this would matter, except that fully bearded hockey players look ugly. The players look as though somebody dumped a box of Smith Brothers cough drops on the ice, and the hairy things started skating around. The old-time House of David baseball dudes at least had cool uniform logos to go with their beards.

Steve Rosenbloom in the Chicago Tribune also weighs in.

So, yes, a straightedge from The Art of Shaving line could lead to better product branding and endorsements of products, perhaps The Art of Shaving.

Problem is, endorsements and branding require an audience, and hockey really doesn’t have one, or at least it doesn’t have one that compares to LeBron James’ NBA Finals, the World Series, and certainly not the Super Bowl.

A bigger NHL audience – bigger being a relative term for what remains a regional sport — just means more casual fans might stop by and not be able to see the puck.

That, not beards, is the sport’s real problem.

Richard Deitsch of SI.com interviews the hockey announcer who inspired Mike Emrick. He’s still calling games at 89.

Bob Chase is a huge fan of the kid. In fact, he would talk about the kid’s broadcasting abilities all day if you let him. Chase first met him when the kid was 14 or 15 or so and sitting at the end of a hockey press box in Fort Wayne, Ind.,  lugging a tape recorder to Memorial Coliseum at the start of a long journey to the top of the NHL broadcasting mountain. You’ve heard of the kid if you are a hockey fan. He is NBC’s NHL verbal maestro Mike Emrick, who turns 69 on August 1.  Bob Chase calls him kid because Chase will turn 90 next January 22.

While Emrick’s oratory skills are on a national stage at the Stanley Cup Final this month, one of the more remarkable hockey broadcasting stories you’ve probably never heard of returns every October in Fort Wayne. Chase recently completed his 62nd season of calling play-by-play for the Fort Wayne Komets, a minor league hockey team in the ECHL that had previous homes in the Central Hockey League and the International Hockey League. If his health is good, which it currently is, Chase will be back calling the Komets again next fall.

Ben Koo of Awful Announcing talks to the president of HBO Sports about the network’s strategy on documentaries.

AA: There have been many articles on how we’re in the golden age of sports documentaries and yet it seems the original pioneer of this space has throttled back its ambition in this space. Going forward what is a realistic expectation to set in terms of output of sports documentaries a year?

Hershman: HBO is dedicated to providing our subscribers with the best original programming on television and that mantra extends to sports documentaries. We have an open-door policy as it pertains to our documentaries. We listen to ideas and pitches from filmmakers from Hollywood to New York to Chicago, and we are dedicated to working with talented producers, and directors.  We review dozens of treatments each year.  The challenge is to find stories and filmmakers that can create something that stands out in an already very crowded field.

AA: ESPN launched 30 for 30 in 2009. In 2011, HBO shut down it’s in-house sports doc production unit. How much of a role did ESPN’s entry into this space play into that decision?

Hershman: HBO is just like any other successful company in that it needed to adapt and make changes in order to remain ahead of the pack. In doing that, we were not influenced by any other networks but rather motivated by our own success. The company simply saw no need to stick with an in-house documentary unit and while the decision was made before my arrival, I agree with the strategy.  HBO Sports needs to be flexible, opportunistic and avoid slipping into a routine or cookie-cutter mode. We have been successful since those changes took effect with documentary films such as Namath, Klitschko, Legendary Nights: Gatti-Ward, Tapia and the Peter Berg-produced State of Play franchise.

Mark Cuban is giving Indiana University $5 million to build a state-of-the-art sports media technology center inside the renovated Assembly Hall.

The gift will help Indiana establish the Mark Cuban Center for Sports Media and Technology, which will house virtual reality equipment and two all-graphic studios. It will also allow the university to install 3-D multi-cameras at Memorial Stadium and Assembly Hall, making IU the first university in the country to have such technology.

Bringing it to Indiana was an extension of Cuban’s efforts to use the technology with the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks — the team he owns — to give players and coaches a competitive advantage.

But he said he doesn’t see a limit to the uses for these technologies, and that he hopes his gift will help put IU at the forefront of their growth.

“It’s like the Internet or streaming – when we first started streaming, who’d have thought we could possibly do all the things we can do?” Cuban said. “But once you get going, you learn new things. That’s what’s going to happen here.”

Michael Bradley of the National Sports Journalism Center celebrates the journalist who exposed FIFA corruption.

One of the first things to go when news staffs are cut is the investigative reporter. The leaner departments get, the more important it is for their members to concentrate on breaking news and instant analysis, the better to feed the 24/7 cycle that has become a byproduct of devices built to deliver information immediately. The smaller the group of available reporters, the less likely an editor has the luxury of assigning someone to a story that will take weeks, if not months, to develop. Back in the ‘70s, Woodward and Bernstein could chase the Watergate crumbs until Deep Throat finally caved and told the whole story. Today, they might have been pulled from the job and asked to cover some city council hearings.

That’s why it is so great Andrew Jennings has been able to spend the past 14 years or so going after FIFA so relentlessly that Sepp Blatter and his droogs wondered what, exactly, Jennings had against them. As he told the Washington Post’s Michael E. Miller, Jennings believed that FIFA had tapped his phone and was following him at times. It didn’t matter. From the time he showed up at the 2002 news conference celebrating Blatter’s re-election as president of soccer’s governing body and asked if Blatter had ever taken a bribe, until last week, when the FIFA hierarchy came tumbling to the ground, Jennings was relentless. He wasn’t always afforded the safety of full-time employment, but he never slowed down. His work helped expose FIFA and trigger an investigation that might just make the horribly corrupt organization legitimate one day.

Jennings’ work is what journalism will always need. But in this age of shrinking staffs and low tolerance for longer articles, it’s unlikely we will see news soldiers of Jennings’ caliber on the watch. That’s a tragedy, because one of the true benefits of a free press is its ability to hold those in power to high standards and to see how they fare. FIFA failed miserably, and Jennings was there for each stumble along the way, until the organization and its leader pitched forward onto the sidewalk.

Chad Finn of the Boston Globe lauds Rob Stone’s work on the World Cup.

It’s to Stone’s credit — as well as that of fellow host Kate Abdo — that the chemistry and camaraderie among the various analysts is already evident despite the various backgrounds and levels of television experience.

“Alexi Lalas, Eric Wynalda, I’ve known them for well over a decade, either covering them as players or working with them on camera,’’ said Stone. “But for the women, most of them are relative TV newbies, and the majority of them don’t live in the United States.

“Fox did a terrific job of bringing these talents over, recognizing who stood out, and planting them in our Women’s World Cup draw and other programming in building up to the tournament, which built that rapport. It is a crew that enjoys being around each other despite these long days. I have not seen one person frown or drop their shoulders and shrug out of work.”

 

Chicago news: O’Bradovich moves to WGN to do Bears postgame shows with Hampton, Koz

After the passing of Doug Buffone, Ed O’Bradovich has decided to join his old friend, Dan Hampton.

From WGN:

WGN Radio announced a new addition to their fall/winter sports lineup entitled TheHamp & O.B. Show with Glen Kozlowski.  The three-hour football postgame show will follow every regular season Chicago Bears game starting Sunday, September 13.

The show will feature NFL Hall of Famer Dan Hampton and former Chicago Bears Ed O’Bradovich and Glen Kozlowski who will provide extensive postgame analysis and insights as only NFL alumnus can provide.

In addition to the postgame breakdown, Hampton will join the Steve Cochran Show and Glen Kozlowski will join Roe Conn every Monday and Friday morning to provide a Bears game recap and preview.

“We’re just trying to make life easier for hardcore Bears fans,” said Vice President of Programming and Content Todd Manley. “No longer do you need to choose between Hamp & O.B., they’re now on the same post game show.”

The show is part of the extensive Bears coverage that includes weekly blogs with game analysis, interviews with players, coaches and front office personnel from WGN’s JP Presser Jarrett Payton and WGN’s Bears Insider Adam Hoge onwgnplus.com.

What Mike Emrick can teach you about language and journalism

An excerpt of my latest column for Poynter.org. One of the more enjoyable column I’ve done in my years of covering sports media.

*******

At the top of our interview, I told Mike Emrick I felt that the premium on writing has diminished in the 140-character new media age. He shares the same concerns.

“Words are the hammers and nails to build a sentence,” Emrick said. “You probably talk to young people about the value of putting together a good sentence, even a spoken one. This will sound like an old guy talking, but it is sort of a lost art.”

Emrick then told a story he heard while sitting next to a job recruiter on a plane.

“He said he talked to a young lady from Haddonfield, N.J. who ‘blew me away,’” Emrick said. “He said, ‘I asked myself why? She put together a good sentence; she made eye contact; and she had a good hand shake. I’m thinking why is that unusual?’ But he added, ‘Today, that’s unusual.’”

Emrick obviously has some natural talent, but he also needed to build a foundation. Looking back, he said it came from reading at a young age.

The short version is that Emrick recommends reading as the best method to improve writing and verbal skills. Naturally, though, he puts it in a much more colorful way.

“Reading is the No. 1 thing that builds vocabulary,” Emrick said. “Read the fun stuff, but also read something with more than a couple syllables. It’s fine to enjoy a milk shake, but also eat a good salad now and then. The milk shake may be fun, but you also need to do something that’s good for yourself.”

Emrick also talked about the importance of learning from role models in the business. In his case, it started by listening to Bob Chase, a minor league hockey announcer in Ft. Wayne who still is calling games at the age of 89. Richard Deitsch of SI.com did a story on Chase this week.

“He is so good at formulating sentences,” Emrick said. “Hearing the King’s English come out over the radio at a young age was very helpful to me.”

Later, Emrick had the good fortune of spending time with Ernie Harwell, the long-time voice of the Detroit Tigers, while researching his Ph.D dissertation. He saw how legendary announcers like Harwell and Scully use stories to connect with their audience. Emrick is big on stories, as he always tries to incorporate a few in his calls.

“I usually have five minutes of material that I have to whack down to 20 seconds,” Emrick said. “But I think the stories are the most lasting. When I listen to someone speak, usually once a week on Sunday, it is the stories that I remember. The stories are far greater than statistics. Stats are here today, gone tomorrow. I remember stories from 20-25 years ago.”