Chicago news: Chuck Swirsky feels weight of sitting in for Harrelson in White Sox booth

An excerpt from my latest column for the Chicago Tribune:

******

Chuck Swirsky has been through just about everything during his long broadcast career. Still, his mind was racing after being confronted with a unique set of challenges Monday in calling the White Sox-Toronto game, his first as a fill-in for Ken Harrelson during the current 11-game road trip.

It was Swirsky’s first baseball game on play-by-play in 36 years. Meticulous about preparation, the radio voice of the Bulls still is cramming to learn about the Sox and their opponents. He then had to deal with a confusing non-double play situation that led to Toronto scoring four runs in the first inning, effectively ending the game for the listless Sox.

And above everything else, Swirsky felt the weight of sitting in Harrelson’s chair.

“There were a lot of moving parts, to say the least,” Swirsky said. “Hawk has huge shoes to fill.”

Swirsky wasn’t asked until Friday night if he could take over play-by-play duties for Harrelson. The team said Harrelson has to undergo a minor surgical procedure and will return to the booth when the Sox come home on June 5.

Swirsky actually was in Toronto visiting his son when he got the request. He promptly drove through the night so he could attend Sox games Saturday and Sunday at U.S. Cellular Field.

“I took a deep breath when they asked me,” Swirsky said. “I thought it would be a great opportunity and challenge.”

Bob Knight, Lou Holtz quietly fade from view

My latest column for the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana:

*******

They commanded our attention during countless autumns and winters.

There was Bob Knight and his red sweater. You watched because he was this mixture of brilliance and inexplicable, unpredictable anger. He could get his Indiana team to perform with precision, and yet he always seemed to be a split second away from tossing a chair across the court.

There was Lou Holtz, a short wisp of man of who had a dominating presence in the land of giants. During his days at Notre Dame, there wasn’t a coach in any sport who had more national TV time than Holtz. You watched because of his frenetic energy on the sidelines fueled by multiple six-packs of Diet Coke that were most definitely not caffeine free.

When their coaching days ended, both men joined ESPN: Knight in 2008 and Holtz in 2004. Their achievements and personas vaulted them quickly to the top of the network’s lineup of analysts. They still commanded our attention.

And now they’re gone. Did anyone notice?

A few weeks back, ESPN disclosed that it no longer will need the services of Knight and Holtz. The statements from the network were relatively the same.

“We thank Bob for his contributions to ESPN’s coverage over the last seven seasons and wish him luck in his future endeavors,” said John Wildhack, ESPN executive vice president, production and programming. “Coach Knight has left an indelible mark on the game of college basketball and he will be remembered as one of the truly great coaches and innovators the game has seen.”

“Lou brought a champion’s perspective and a legacy of accomplishment to our coverage along with his distinctive style and humor. We appreciate his contributions and wish him all the best in the future.”

The parting of the ways probably marks the last time Knight and Holtz will be spotlighted on a national stage. It seems unlikely that they will land at another network. If they do, it won’t be the same.

For all the noise and bluster their careers generated, news of their departures was eerily quiet. No big headlines. No litany of testimonials. Do a Google search. You’ll only find the perfunctory statements from ESPN and a few paragraphs on various websites.

The biggest reaction actually came from new Michigan Jim Harbaugh. Several weeks after the announcement, he issued a tweet about Holtz:

“Just heard Lou Holtz is no longer at ESPN Ridiculous! Saturday’s won’t be the same, Love Lou Holtz! Chris Fowler not on Game Day, Flummoxed.”

However, few other people were “flummoxed” about Knight’s and Holtz’s departure.

Age likely was a factor for the end of their broadcast careers. Holtz is 78 and he said in an interview last year that he wanted to spend more time playing golf and being with his family. That all sounds good, but he also might have known his time was up at ESPN. He and Mark May, his fellow Saturday analyst, haven’t been everyone’s favorites. Holtz could have been out anyway with an expected ESPN reshuffle for its college football coverage in the wake of Rece Davis being host of “GameDay.”

Meanwhile, the expiration date for the 74-year-old Knight should have occurred a few years back. It is perplexing that it didn’t work out better for him at ESPN.

When Knight was brought on board in 2008, ESPN’s Norby Williamson gushed to Sports Illustrated:

“He’s always been the type of person that if you were flipping through the channels and you saw him in a long-form interview or a press conference or during one of his games, you stopped and watched it. There are very few people like that. It was a fairly easy decision.”

Knight, though, wasn’t a must-watch as an analyst. After being showcased early on by ESPN, Knight saw his role reduced dramatically. This year, he did American Athletic Conference games as part of a three-man team. Matt Yoder of Awful Announcing wrote: “Knight is literally about the 837th most visible person at the network at the present moment.”

It is telling that Knight’s last telecast working for ESPN was the NIT championship game. Bob Knight doesn’t do NIT, right? Yet there he was at Madison Square Garden on the call for a game in the consolation (losers) tournament.

At the end of the telecast, Knight thanked everyone he worked with at ESPN. Then he added: “I appreciated having had the opportunity to visit with you fans over the past four years about this game that I have loved so much during my entire life. You fans, I appreciate you more than I could ever tell you. Thanks.”

Given his stature as a coach, Knight figured to make his farewell on a stage much bigger than the NIT. Things, though, doesn’t always go as planned.

As a reporter who covered both coaches in their heydays, something feels weird about saying good-bye to Knight and Holtz in this manner. These are men who still fill up the room with their presence. They won games, big games, memorable games.

Time marches on, for sure. Other coaches are getting their turns.

College sports, though, probably will never two coaches like Knight and Holtz. Given the scope of their careers and how they dominated the sporting landscape for so long, it seems inconceivable that barely anyone noticed when Bob Knight and Lou Holtz walked out the door, disappearing quietly into the night.

 

A Sherman was on ESPN during Cubs’ game; It wasn’t me

So I’m watching the Cubs game on ESPN last night, and who do I see on the screen?

That young man wearing the Ron Santo jersey is Matt Sherman, who just completed his freshman year at the University of Illinois. He also just learned he has been accepted to the College of Media, where he will be studying advertising and communications. His parents are very proud.

Matt said the ESPN cameraman was just over his shoulder in centerfield, and he was talking to him throughout the game.

As for how the son of a diehard White Sox fan became a Cubs fan, don’t ask. Still a great kid despite that character flaw.

Thank goodness: Yankees only have two more games left on ESPN Sunday Night Baseball

ESPN needs to make a name change. It should be “Yankees Sunday Night Baseball.”

The Yankees raised their average to .500 with their fourth appearance in eight weeks on ESPN’s featured package with Sunday’s game against Texas. Seems a bit excessive, doesn’t it? It feels as if Dan Shulman calls as many Yankees games as John Sterling.

The good news, according to Richard Sandomir of the New York Times, is that the Yankees are eligible for only two more Sunday night appearances this year.

Sandomir writes:

“A lot of it has to do with the way the schedule plays out,” said Doug White, a senior director of programming and acquisitions at ESPN. “Three of those matchups have been against teams of high interest — two against the Red Sox and one against the Mets when they were hot. Obviously, you have to take your opportunities when they come in the schedule.”

White said ESPN’s early focus on the Yankees was not intended to capitalize on the return of Alex Rodriguez from a season-long suspension. Instead, he said, the Yankees retain a national appeal and have played reasonably well, and games against Boston draw a broad range of viewers. Although the Rangers are struggling, their television market is the nation’s fifth largest.

Sorry, but Yankees-Texas hardly rated a featured Sunday night date. Not when St. Louis was playing Kansas City on the same day. That was a much better match-up featuring two possible World Series teams.

Now it isn’t as if the Cardinals are getting slighted on Sunday night. Sandomir notes St. Louis is scheduled five games through July 19.

But instead of the Yankees, how about doing more with the Royals? Kansas City is showing last year’s October run wasn’t a fluke.

Here’s also hoping a surprise team like Houston also gets its games on Sunday night. And who saw Minnesota getting off to such a good start?

Sure, the Yankees always do solid ratings. But if other teams get their chance in the spotlight, perhaps a following will build for them. Then people get interested in those teams during the postseason. That’s when the ratings count the most.

Let the record the show, the Yankees only have played in one World Series since 2003.

 

 

Matt Millen to be lead football analyst for Big Ten Network

John Ourand of Sports Business Daily reports Matt Millen is leaving ESPN to join BTN. There’s also a Fox Sports component.

Millen also will participate on Fox Sports 1 studio shows around college football and the NFL. The long-term deal gives him the opportunity to do NFL and college games on Fox’s broadcast channel.

It is a good move for BTN. Gives them a solid game analyst and he will be a presence in Fox Sports 1 and BTN’s studio shows.

It also is a good move for Millen. It seemed like he got a bit lost at ESPN.

 

 

 

 

I love kids, but a reporter on deadline wouldn’t find Curry’s daughter very amusing

Thanks for Roy Bragg of the San Antonio Express-News for reaching out to me about Stephen Curry’s very cute daughter.

Here is what I said to him for his column.

Yoder, however, agrees with Ed Sherman’s assertion that sports journalists add necessary context, color and analysis to the games. That added value, Sherman said, is even more vital now in a world full of data.

The post-game press conference is an important part of that job, said Sherman, whose Sherman Report also covers sports media.

“These reporters are trying to do a job on a deadline,” he said. “And they’re trying to get a quote. Curry was trying to give thoughtful answers. He’s the MVP of the league, and you want to hear what he has to say about the first game.”

Sherman, as is the case with other journalists critical of the girl being present at the table, agree that Riley is “adorable. But if that’s you (in the press conference) and if you’re doing your job and your deadline is in 15 minutes, you’re not thinking it’s so adorable.”

And I really, really do love kids. But there’s a time and place for everything.

OK, feel free to dump on me now.

Sports media beat: Kenny Albert’s grueling schedule during NHL playoffs; Netflix and sports; more Bill Simmons

Spanning the globe to give you the constant variety of sports media.

*******

Richard Sandomir of the New York Times on Kenny Albert’s exhausting broadcast schedule during the NHL playoffs.

When Kenny Albert discusses the travel schedule behind his calling 27 N.H.L. playoff games since April 15, he is matter-of-fact, not boastful. His itineraries are as familiar to him as goaltenders’ saves.

First, there were 11 games in 11 days (including two Fox Sports 1 baseball broadcasts). After four days off, there was a stretch of 13 games in 14 days.

Heading into Game 4 of the Eastern Conference finals between the Rangers and the Tampa Bay Lightning on Friday, Albert will have experienced a fairly light load, by his standards: five games in eight days.

“Amazingly, I feel pretty good,” Albert, 47, said Wednesday in a telephone interview from Tampa, Fla., before the Lightning beat the Rangers, 6-5, in overtime. “I’m really lucky with my voice. Last year, I spoke with a couple of throat doctors who gave me advice about what to get over the counter at the pharmacy. I kept Hall’s in business the last couple of playoffs.”

His workload is especially large because, in addition to calling games forNBC’s broadcast and cable networks, he is also the local radio voice of the Rangers. He will follow the Rangers as long as they stay in the playoffs.

Will Leitch for Sports on Earth details why ESPN will miss Bill Simmons.

And now Simmons is gone, and you can’t help but worry. Not to get all Mad Men on you, but the whole Bristol/Grantland dynamic feels a lot like McCann Erickson and Sterling Cooper: The tiny boutique producing high quality, small-scale work suddenly looks, to the massive behemoth who owns it, as a wild-card it needs to get under more control. It’s no wonder that many in Bristol were supposedly “cheering” when Simmons got the ax last week; they saw a rogue employee attempting to challenge the Borg. But for those who worked with him at Grantland — for those he protected from the Borg’s influence — he was the perfect boss.

Peter Kafka of Recode reports Neflix doesn’t appear as if it will get into sports–for now.

Sarandos: I will never say never, but I would say that where we sit today, I don’t think the on-demand to sports is enough of an addition to the value proposition to chase. I think the leagues have tremendous leverage in those deals, so it’s not like we’re going to get in and de-leverage the leagues. We’re going to go in and overpay like everyone else does, so it doesn’t get me that excited. Not to say that it wouldn’t someday, down the road, make sense. Today, I think there’s lots of growth in what we’re doing.

Dan Levy of Awful Announcing writes about an issue involving plagiarism for a Runner’s World columnist.

Remy’s column, which we highlighted at the time here, stole the work of “The Evster” a columnist for Philadephia-centric blog The 700 Level, who had written a mock screed against running you can read here. It was clearly a work of satire, which made it even more curious when Remy took the work in a further attempt at satire and repackaged it on Remy’s World.

Pro tip: when you are trying to create a work of satire, copying and pasting previously written satirical work isn’t the best way to do that. It’s plagiarism. It’s theft.

The Chicago Tribune’s Dan Wiederer, writing for APSE’s site, gets insights from NFL reporters on covering the recent draft.

5. What would you like to see more of/less of?

Zrebiec: I’m a sucker for human interest stories. I always enjoy reading those about some of the top prospects before the draft. I love seeing stories that chronicle the path to the draft for certain players. I always enjoy the local angles. As far as what I’d like to see less of, I find most of the reports about who is visiting here or there and who is meeting with whom at the combine to be completely pointless. One, when it’s all said and done, teams probably see and talk to over a 100 prospects either at the combine, the various all-star games, pro days, in-house visits, etc. These meetings just don’t mean a whole lot. Some teams even bring guys in as a smokescreen, even if they have no intention of drafting that player. I know news is news, and if you hear that a player is in for a visit, it’s harmless to report it. But there probably should be some perspective and context added, too.

Somers: I’d probably like to see more analysis of past drafts. How have the “experts” done over the years? How have teams done over the past five years or so? There is too much immediate analysis on this year’s draft picks. Then again, people can’t get enough of it and those stories tend to generate thousands of page views.

Goessling: I’d probably like to see the pro days covered in a little more subdued fashion; especially for quarterbacks, they’ve become such a production that it’s hard to separate on-field results from hype. The Vikings’ distaste for pro days probably helped with (drafting) Teddy Bridgewater last year; they didn’t base a big part of their evaluation on the pro day, because of how leery they are of them. I think the media could probably move in the same direction.

A reader writes into the Cleveland Plain-Dealer asking for more high school coverage.

I would much rather read about high school sports than to have little more than the Cavaliers, the disappointing Indian, and the horrendous Browns filling the sports pages of my daily newspaper. Please continue to give us meaningful high school results. A once-a-week summary for many sports is perfectly fine. Area and statewide track and field leaders on Saturdays; statewide football results on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays; statewide softball results as the games occur (you don’t need inning-by-inning summaries, and teams W-L records can be shown, say, once a week). I hope you will consider devoting more time to the high schools, less time to the pampered, grossly overpaid professionals.

 

Women in sports media: Milestone with two female columnists on cover of USA Today; Numbers, though, should be higher

Excerpts from my latest column for Poynter.

*******

The sports front page of the April 9 edition of USA Today featured two columns from the Masters. Nancy Armour wrote about Bubba Watson, while Christine Brennan looked at the favorites for the tournament.

Think about that for a moment: Two women sports columnists being prominently displayed on by the one of the nation’s top circulation newspaper, and they were writing about the top men’s event in golf.

Did you notice?

“If people didn’t notice, that’s great,” Brennan said.

Indeed, the columns show how far women have come from the days, not that long ago, when they weren’t allowed in locker rooms. Women are read, seen and heard on various platforms in sports. It also should be noted the sports editor for that edition was Mary Byrne, who has since left the paper to join ESPN.com.

Yet that USA Today sports front, while an encouraging snapshot, doesn’t tell the entire story. Sadly in 2015, there still is a long way for women to go in sports media. In 2012, the Associated Press Sports Editors commissioned a report by the Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sports. The grades for gender for total staff and sports editors: F. The situation hasn’t improved much since then.

The good and the bad will be discussed when the Association for Women in Sports Media launches their annual convention Saturday in Denver. The association is more commonly referred to as “awesome” based on its initials, AWSM.

*******

Michaelis, though, expected more progress. She called the early ’90, when she started her career, “a golden age” for women. Pioneers like Brennan and others in the ‘70s and ‘80s blew open doors for young female sportswriters like Michaelis. However, 20 years later, women still make up roughly 10 percent of overall staff for newspaper sports sections.

“If you had asked me in 1995, what would sports departments look like in 20 years, I would have said women likely would have made up 25 percent,” Michaelis said. “And that might not have been optimistic enough. It’s very distressing there hasn’t been more growth.”

 

Chicago news: Blackhawks radio team gets payoff in playoffs

An excerpt from my latest Chicago Tribune column.

******

John Wiedeman didn’t say much Wednesday.  It wasn’t because he didn’t have anything to say.

The radio voice of the Blackhawks on WGN-720 knew it was imperative to rest his vocal chords after calling the longest game in franchise history Tuesday night.

“I definitely felt it last night after the game,” Wiedeman said. “I was pounding the water to put out the fire in my throat.”

Wiedeman, though, wouldn’t have it any other way. The playoffs always are the payoff for him and his partner, former Blackhawk center Troy Murray. Their TV counterparts, Pat Foley and Eddie Olczyk, get more fanfare and play to larger audiences during the regular season. However, only the first round of the playoffs air on local TV. NBC and NBCSN take over from there. That means Foley is done for the season, and Olczyk gets some, but not of all the Blackhawks playoff games with his network duties.

Meanwhile, the Blackhawks’ radio team is on the call for the entire postseason package.

“People ask, ‘Would you rather be on the TV side?’” Murray said. “Yeah, that’s great, but I enjoy doing radio. I feel sorry for Pat not being able to do these games. The fact that John and I get to continue into the postseason makes all the difference in the world.”

Wiedeman truly has savored every moment he’s been with the team. Even though he grew up in Kansas City, he says catching a glimpse of a Blackhawks game on TV during the 1960s started his love affair with hockey. Later, he used to drive up from Kansas City to see Murray and Olczyk play on the Blackhawks teams during the ‘80s.

After calling games for the New York Islanders, Wiedeman jumped at the opportunity when the Blackhawks’ radio job became open prior to the 2006-07 season.

“I always had such a passion for the Blackhawks,” Wiedeman said. “I couldn’t have imagined this would ever happen.”