Carlos Beltran: Speaking to media is part of an athlete’s job

David Lennon of Newsday talked to Carlos Beltran about the media’s relationship with athletes. Let’s just say the Yankee responded like a true pro.

“I feel like it’s my job,” Beltran said. “For fans out there, [reporters] are the voice of what’s happening, so they can know what’s going on in the clubhouse and around the game.

“Honestly speaking, it’s not every day I feel like talking. That’s human nature. But I know that it’s my responsibility to be here and answer the questions. I don’t need to answer every question. But I know that sometimes when you play a game and something goes wrong, people want to talk about it.”

And this from Beltran:

Beltran, with eight years in New York under his belt, is pretty much an elder statesman now. He had a few rocky moments in Flushing but has never ducked the attention.

“You always have to be professional,” Beltran said. “I have to be professional with you, but at the same time, you have to be professional with me. It’s got to be a two-way street.”

 

 

Six weeks of nothing: Time to think out of box for spring training coverage

When I covered the White Sox in the ’80s, people always were jealous that I got to escape winter and spend six weeks in Florida. Frankly, I really didn’t like it.

I’ll admit the weather was nice, but spring training felt like a slog of writing seemingly endless stories. Plus once the games began, you spent those nice spring days confined to a hot, tight press box. Not exactly paradise.

Peter May, formerly the Red Sox beat writer for the Boston Globe, wrote his views of the tedium that is spring training.

Spring training is about to begin. Or, as its known in Boston and most other MLB cities — six weeks of journalistic waterboarding.

Very little, if any, actual news is ever generated in the time that baseball teams spend getting ready for the season. But that won’t stop the newspapers in Boston and elsewhere from bombarding us with banal and sleep-inducing stories on a daily basis.

May calls for a change in approach:

This is not to suggest newspapers (and other media outlets) not have reporters at spring training. Of course they should. This is instead an appeal to sports and assignment editors across the board to think outside the box and recognize spring training for what it really is: an expensive, six-week sham of non-news stories packaged as must-read, daily journalism.

You’re unlikely to see such an approach in Boston, where we’ve been inured to reams of Red Sox coverage. I always wondered why John Henry wanted to buy the Globe when, based on how the newspaper treated his team, he was basically the de-facto owner. (I refer you to August 2007, when the Globe actually paired the Celtics’ acquisition of Kevin Garnett with the Red Sox acquisition of Eric Gagne on the front page. Talk about false equivalence.)

Part of this slavish devotion to the norm is, well, a slavish devotion to the norm. That’s how we’ve always done it! Or the feeling that the fans can’t get enough of it (which, if true, says a lot about the intelligence of the reader). Part of it is the ineluctable reaction to the talk radio culture and the expansion of web sites and cable outlets.

The Times tries to be different. (Full disclosure: I am an occasional contributor to the newspaper.) It does not box itself in by demanding stories every day on both the Mets and Yankees. It encourages its writers to think creatively and gives them the time to explore and investigate a non-mundane story. This year, when a Times’ beat writer gets a week off, a stringer will likely monitor the team he covers with no expectation of daily input.

As one Times editor told me, “if you’re committed to having something every single day, you are stuck. It’s just talk radio on the written page, a daily drip-drop of stuff that all sounds the same.”

Exactly.

ESPN writer on not quoting Alex Rodriguez: ‘He’s a proven liar, a repeated liar’

J.R. Moehringer did a remarkable story on Alex Rodriguez for the latest edition of ESPN The Magazine. Even if you detest A-Rod, it definitely is worth your time if you want to see a different way of writing a profile. Brilliant.

Moehringer spent considerable time with the disgraced star. Yet he wrote the piece without using a quote.

He explains in this passage:

How many pills, creams or needles he used, how much those pills, creams or needles might have enhanced his already towering gifts, and to what lengths he went to conceal it — these and other questions will be debated forever, and will never fully be resolved, but there’s no longer any debate about Rodriguez’s credibility. He’s a proven liar, a repeated liar, and thus, as he prepares to emerge from the longest steroid-related suspension in the history of baseball, as he readies himself physically and mentally for his 21st spring training, there’s tremendous interest in his story, but there’s just no point in quoting him.

More than no point, there’s just no way.

Take a sentence from Rodriguez, set it between two quotation marks and watch what happens; it curdles like year-old milk. The words become unstable, unusable, weirdly ironic. It’s not a choice, to quote or not to quote, it’s simple science, obeisance to strict natural laws, to the crazy alchemy between his damaged credibility and basic punctuation. Quoting Rodriguez is like dropping a Mento into a Diet Coke. It makes a big whoosh, everyone gets excited, for about three seconds, and then it’s just a mess, and you wonder what’s been accomplished, besides some stickiness, and maybe a permanent stain.

In fact, don’t even bother taking out a recorder or notebook in Rodriguez’s presence. Aside from the fact that it induces in him a physical condition, Resting Zombie Face, and aside from the fact that he says off the record more than an allergist saysgesundheit, he’s forfeited his right to exactitude. No more verbatim for him. Not right now. His suspension is over, but so is the public’s suspension of disbelief. If he hopes to recapture the public trust, to repair his image, it will be through actions, not words.

 

Pam Oliver: Sideline reporters should be journalists, not celebrities

My latest column for Poynter.org focuses on some important comments from Pam Oliver to aspiring young women journalists.

From the column:

*******

Pam Oliver knew she had a captive audience to deliver her message.

“The journalism has to matter,” Oliver said repeatedly at Northwestern Tuesday as part of the Medill School of Journalism’s “Beyond The Box Score” series.

She joined USA Today columnist Christine Brennan, Rachel Nichols of CNN and Turner Sports, and ESPN’s Cassidy Hubbarth on a panel titled, “The Female Voice in Sports Media.”

Oliver, who was Fox Sports’ top sideline reporter for the NFL for years, made headlines last year for her honest reaction to Fox moving her off that assignment and replacing her with the younger Erin Andrews.

When Brennan, who moderated the session, asked the panelists to open by giving their assessments of the media landscape as it relates to the female voice, Oliver saw a room full of young aspiring women journalists. She is concerned that building a solid journalism foundation has become secondary for many students who want a career in sports. Many seem to be more attracted to the celebrity of being a sideline reporter.

Oliver clearly wanted to set them on the right path.

“It’s a small club of women (in sports media) who put journalism first,” Oliver said. “They’re not in it to be celebrities or big on Twitter. You can tell when someone is serious with what they are doing. You can tell when someone is putting in the hours to get to know the players and coaches beyond just using your looks, or you know, your assets.

“I wish some of the hiring practices would improve. There’s a definite pattern with a certain look and certain quality that the outlets are going after.”

At this point, Oliver paused and took a sip of water. She admitted the issue gets her “emotional.”

“I just want to see passion out there and young people who are in it for the right reason,” Oliver continued. “It’s not about wanting to be seen on TV. It’s about wanting to be a journalist. I hope and pray as I look around the room that you’re willing to do the work.”

Oliver eventually finished her monologue by saying, “It’s the journalism, it’s the journalism.”

*****

Photo by Sean Su/Daily Northwestern.

 

 

Hockey Day in America: NBC goes back to Lake Placid to recall Miracle

It’s all about marketing, right?

A tripleheader on NBC and NBCSN Sunday gets taken to another level when packaged as “Hockey Day in America.” Sounds a bit more special, doesn’t it?

The network is planning some twists on a familiar tale, the 1980 U.S. hockey team.

Here’s the rundown from NBC:

*******

NBC Sports Group will celebrate hockey in the United States with “Hockey Day In America coverage this Sunday from the site of one of the most influential hockey games in U.S. history, when NBC and NBCSN present a hockey tripleheader with studio coverage on-site from Lake Placid, N.Y., on the 35th anniversary of the1980 “Miracle On Ice.”

Sunday’s Hockey Day In America coverage begins at noon ET on NBC with Alex Ovechkin and the Washington Capitals visiting Claude Giroux and the Philadelphia Flyers, followed by a rematch of the 2013 Stanley Cup Final at 3:30 p.m. ET between Milan Lucic’s Boston Bruins, and Patrick Kane’s Chicago Blackhawks. Coverage shifts to NBCSN at 7 p.m. ET for NHL Live, followed by an 8 p.m. ET puck drop between Zach Parise and the Minnesota Wild and Jamie Benn and the Dallas Stars, concluding an 11-hour block of NHL programming across NBC and NBCSN.

In addition to extensive Hockey Day In America coverage, NBCSN will present the latest iteration of the NHL Stadium Series on Saturday night at 10 p.m. ET, when Joe Pavelski and the San Jose Sharks host Jonathan Quick and the Los Angeles Kings at Levi’s Stadium, home of the NFL’s San Francisco 49ers, in Santa Clara, Calif. Pre-game coverage begins at 9:30 p.m. ET with NHL Live on-site from Levi’s Stadium.

HOCKEY DAY IN AMERICA COVERAGE ON NBC AND NBCSN

Hockey Day In America studio coverage will originate live from Lake Placid throughout the day on Sunday. Liam McHugh will anchor Sunday’s coverage, alongside analysts and former players Mike Milbury, Keith Jones and Jeremy Roenick.

NBC and NBCSN’s Hockey Day In America presentation will include interviews with members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Team, as well as in-depth features surrounding Hockey Day In America, exploring hockey’s influence and impact in America. Feature stories and interviews include:

–1980 U.S. Olympic Team Forward Mark Wells – NBC Sports’ Jimmy Roberts sits down with Mark Wells to discuss the 1980 U.S. Olympic Team, his adversity in life after hockey, including a debilitating back injury and the sale of his 1980 Olympic gold medal, and how he’s now getting back on his skates.

–U.S. Sled Hockey’s Josh Sweeney – A U.S. Marine who lost his legs in an IED explosion in Afghanistan on 2009,Josh Sweeney brings viewers inside the role sled hockey played in his recovery, which ultimately led him to Sochi, where he scored the game-winning goal in the 2014 Paralympic gold medal final.

–Defending The Blue Line – NBC Sports profiles Defending The Blue Line, a foundation whose mission is to ensure children of military members are afforded every opportunity to play hockey, and the story of SFC Wade Scott, who was wounded in Afghanistan, and his two young boys who participate in the program.

–Pierre McGuire with Ryan Suter – NBC Sports Group’s Inside-The-Glass analyst Pierre McGuire sits down with Minnesota Wild defenseman Ryan Suter. Suter’s father Bob, who passed away in September, was a member of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Team, and will have his number raised to the rafters in Lake Placid this weekend.

–U.S. National Team Development Program – A profile of the program which has served as the launching pad for many NHL stars, including Patrick Kane, Zach Parise, Jimmy Howard and Ryan Suter, as well as budding stars like Jack Eichel.

Hey Dickie V, you were missed at the Duke-North Carolina game

Did you miss Dick Vitale not doing the call for Duke’s thrilling 92-90 overtime victory Wednesday? He did.

During the game he sent out this tweet through @DickieV:

Wednesday marked the first time Vitale hadn’t worked the big rivalry game in years for ESPN. In recent seasons, he had teamed with Dan Shulman and Jay Bilas on the call.

This year, ESPN decided to only use Shulman and Bilas, forcing Vitale to watch at home. Prior to the game, Vitale admitted his disappointment to the Raleigh News & Observer:

“I told them that I cannot lie when a writer asks me what’s my feeling not doing the game,” he said. “I said I have to be honest. And my honest reply to you is, obviously, I’m a loyal, team player. I will go where my bosses tell me to go.

“But in my heart I will absolutely miss being a part of North Carolina-Duke.”

“It’s been a special part of my basketball and my announcing career,” Vitale said. “And I will never forget the magical moments that I’ve had, being able to be part of such an incredible rivalry.”

It definitely was different without Vitale. While Bilas calls a solid game, he can’t match Vitale for the histrionics that seemed to be required for the latest clash of rivals.

The wild finish to regulation and the frenetic pace of the overtime demanded the requisite shouts of “UNNN-BELLLIEVV-ABBLLLE” and “AWWOEESSOUMMEE!” from Vitale.

Bilas tried to match the excitement by repeatedly saying, “What a game.” But he doesn’t come close to hitting the notes that Vitale can.

Vitale definitely was missed judging by some of the tweets:

Sure, Vitale has his share of critics and there were some who thought the telecast was better without him. Probably a few of them are in Bristol. Clearly, ESPN wants to establish Bilas as its No. 1 analyst on college basketball.

But there are certain games that still demand Vitale’s presence. Duke-North Carolina tops the list.

The rematch is set for March 7 at Chapel Hill. Here’s hoping Dickie V is there, sitting next to Shulman and Bilas.

 

 

 

 

Chicago news: Dan McNeil on why he left sports talk radio for The Drive

My latest Chicago Tribune column is about the latest move for Dan McNeil.

You also can access here via my Twitter feed at @Sherman_Report.

From the column:

********

Dan McNeil had a chance to return to his old turf. WSCR-AM 670 called a couple weeks ago when former Bears long-snapper Patrick Mannelly decided to walk away from his role as McNeil’s replacement on the midday show.

McNeil listened, but he said his mind already was made up. It was time to head in another direction.

Or as he says, “I knew I was ready for a change in the backdrop.”

Tuesday, it was officially announced that McNeil will team with Pete McMurray for a new morning show on “The Drive,” WDRV-FM 97.1. Initially reported by Robert Feder, the pair will replace Steve Downes, who is retiring. McNeil said the new show, which will begin in early March, will feature “a guy-talk format” on the classic rock station.

“I get excited talking about music and movies,” McNeil said. “You know, the type of stuff guys talk about with their buddies on the golf course. That’s what the show will sound like.”

Of course, there will be sports talk. McNeil figures Bears discussion will be prevalent on Mondays after a game. However, unlike his previous jobs, he won’t be involved in 24/7 chatter about who will fill the Bears’ holes at linebacker.

“We’re not going to ignore what a huge percentage of men want to talk about (the Bears),” McNeil said. “But let’s put it this way: I can kick around Jay Cutler for five minutes and say, ‘Here’s ACDC.'”

 

How is Sports Illustrated’s swimsuit issue still a thing?

My latest column for the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana has me revisiting an old rant.

The video mocking the swimsuit edition on “Last Week with John Oliver” and excerpts of my column:

I had thought about taking a pass on dumping on Sports Illustrated’s swimsuit edition this year. Let someone else do it. There are plenty of people out there who object to the magazine’s annual lowering of its standards.

Then I saw a video from “Last Week with John Oliver.” The HBO show does a regular feature titled, “How is this still a thing?”

Last night, the target was SI’s swimsuit edition. As you would expect, the three-minute critique was funny and mocking of SI.

At one point, the narrator notes in the ‘80s and ‘90s, the prospect of seeing scantily-clad women in a sports magazine was “tantalizing.” Times, though, have changed.

“Do people not understand they can now just type ‘naked ladies’ into the Internet and see what Google throws at them?”

That line inspired a big laugh. Eventually, the narrator delivered this hammer: “Even SI knows (the swimsuit edition) is losing its relevance.”

Indeed, this year’s swimsuit edition made me feel sadder than usual.

*******

Yet you could feel a sense of desperation with the cover of this year’s edition. It features Hannah Davis, also known as Derek Jeter’s girlfriend, pulling down the bottom of her bikini. Perhaps it was hot and she suffered from some chafing issues on the day of the shoot?

Let’s just say, another centimeter more and there would have been nothing left to the imagination. As it was, the cover was ripped for going too far.

Wrote Jennifer Weiner in The New York Times: “It’s shocking, and it’s meant to be. With hard-core pornography available to anyone with a laptop and a credit card, Sports Illustrated has to raise the stakes if it wants to stay relevant.”

SI obviously feels as if it has to push the envelope to keep the public interested in the swimsuit edition. As racy as the cover is, it doesn’t come close to matching some of the photos inside.

It seems like many of the women don’t like the idea of wearing the entire bikini. I counted so you didn’t have to: There are 32 photos of the women either without tops or see-through tops. I’m not even getting into thongs or the one of shot of a completely naked Kate Bock with the bikini sitting at her side.

Book report: Great untold story about Duffy Daugherty, Michigan State integrating college football

Black History Month always features stories about the integration of college football in the 1960s. Usually, the accounts focus on the first African-American players who broke the barriers to play at powerhouse schools in the South.

However, there’s a significant and often overlooked part of this saga that took place at Michigan State. A new book by Tom Shanahan, “Raye of Light,” examines how Duffy Daugherty built the great Spartans teams of the 1960s by actively recruiting elite African-American players such as Bubba Smith and George Webster. The starting quarterback on his great 1966 team was Jimmy Raye, an African-American.

In fact, that team had 20 African-American players at a time when even Northern schools had limited minorities on their rosters.

The book is a fascinating story about how Daugherty had a huge role in integrating the game. Here’s a Q/A with Shanahan.

What motivated you to do the book?

 Shanahan: As a kid growing up Big Rapids, Mich., I knew there was something unusual about a roster with a black quarterback and numerous black stars, but I was too young to understand the social significance. With my love of history, the seed remained planted until I had the opportunity to research a sports story with a Civil Rights backdrop. It became clearer to me Duffy and Jimmy Raye have not received their proper credit for leading the integration of college football. Duffy for his “Underground Railroad” recruiting the segregated South; Jimmy as the South’s first black quarterback to win a national title and as a long-time trailblazing black college and NFL coach. I write Bubba Smith was the most famous of Duffy’s passengers, but Jimmy is the most socially significant as a quarterback and mentor to so many coaches, including Tony Dungy. When Dungy was a kid, he sat in Spartan Stadium and was inspired to see Raye play quarterback.

There has been revisionist history surrounding the role of the 1970 USC-Alabama game, but the ground Duffy broke forced Alabama to play teams outside the segregated South. When Martin Luther King spoke at Michigan State 50 years ago on Feb. 11, 1965, he answered a question about waiting for the right time to push integration: “Time is neutral,” said MLK, “and the time is always right to do right.” That was Duffy. He did not wait for the alumni to tell him the right time to recruit black players or to start a black quarterback.

What should people know about Duffy Daugherty?

That only Duffy had a recruiting network in the segregated South. The first time Duffy was invited to speak in the South, he was appalled black high school coaches couldn’t attend. He subsequently staged a clinic in the South for black coaches and invited them to future clinics at Michigan State. Minnesota coach Murray Warmath also was a pioneer recruiting black players, but his contacts and the contacts of other Big Ten coaches were anecdotal – they learned about a player from a friend of a friend. It’s a shame there is no Big Ten Award named for Duffy Daugherty and Murray Warmath. Instead, the Big Ten Coach of the Year Award is named for Woody Hayes, a bully fired for punching an opposing player on the sidelines, and Bo Schembecher, who never won a national title.

It also became clear researching the book it was important to debunk myths that Alabama coach Bear Bryant sent southern black players to Daugherty. My research revealed none of the 44 black players Daugherty recruited from the South between 1959 and 1972 (his last season) were from Alabama. In the late 1960s, Civil Rights attorney U.W. Clemon revealed in court depositions that Bryant had virtually no knowledge of black athletes in the South. Bryant also said on archived film in the 2008 HBO documentary “Breaking the Huddle” that he couldn’t find black athletes qualified academically and athletically – a contradictory statement. To believe such myths is an egregious injustice to Duffy’s legacy. It reduces him to sitting at his desk, answering the phone and granting a scholarship to an athlete sight unseen. In reality, Duffy was the one with his boots on the ground in the South.

It should be noted Duffy’s 1966 roster with the then-unheard number of 20 black players influenced more than the South. USC has a long history of integrated teams, yet the Trojans had only seven black players on their 1967 national championship team. That total jumped to 23 on USC’s 1972 national title squad.

What stood out in interviewing the players and hearing their stories?

How much they enjoyed their time escaping segregation and gaining an education at Michigan State. Gene Washington rarely went home to Texas rather than be subjected to segregation humiliations. George Webster of South Carolina said he had never known black and white people to get along and attend school together. Charlie Thornhill of Virginia said he never trusted a white person until he came to Michigan State. Clinton Jones of Cleveland said Michigan State was an oasis from racism he knew in a northern urban city and the violence taking place in the South.

They are proud of their role in the integration of college football and their accomplishments on the field. No school has come close to matching Michigan State’s four first-round NFL draft picks among the first eight – Bubba Smith, No. 1; Clinton Jones, No. 2; George Webster, No. 5; and Gene Washington, No. 8. Also, they are the first four seniors from the same class named to the College Football Hall of Fame since Boston College in 1940. And as such they are the first foursome of black players.

Bubba Smith was a great player and a unique character. What do you think it was like for him when he first arrived on the campus?

Everyone has a Bubba story. That tells me Bubba loved his time Michigan State. There is a story of him encountering white students at the sprawling Brodie dorm complex in a water balloon fight. They invited Bubba to join in. In a gymnastics class, the 6-8, 285-pounder would jump off a trampoline with an Olympic-styled finishing pose. He joined a Jewish fraternity. When I asked Jimmy Raye why, he said, “Because he could.”

The best story, though, was when he was pulled over for $300 in parking tickets on the eve of the “Game of the Century.” He was driving his self-proclaimed Bubba mobile in an impromptu parade down Grand River Avenue packed with rabid fans on the sidewalks. Bubba loved embellishing that story over the years, but Jimmy Raye was a passenger with a true account.

Either way, I think it would make for a great Kenny Mayne-styled ESPN story to reenact the parade and arrest – perhaps on the 50th anniversary of the 1966 Game of the Century. The 2008 HBO documentary “Breaking the Huddle” unfairly portrays Bubba in a short segment as a goofball. In reality he was a bright and sensitive gentle giant.

 Nearly 50 years later, how did the players feel about the famous 10-10 tie?

The players have come to realize, thanks to a gracious letter from Notre Dame coach Ara Parseghian upon their 30th reunion, the 10-10 tie made them immortal despite finishing No. 2 to the Irish in the AP and UPI polls. The “Game of the Century”was a quasi-BCS national championship game. Can you name another team that finished second remembered as respectfully as Michigan State’s 1966 powerhouse? The players say Duffy told them they were national champions despite the controversial finish in the AP and UPI polls.

 So who should have won the national championship in ’66?                          

That National Football Foundation is the only organization that got it right by presenting Michigan State and Notre Dame the MacArthur Bowl as co-national champions. NFF officials correctly stated you can’t separate two teams with identical records that played to a 10-10 tie on the field. However, there is a case to be made for Michigan State as No. 1. The Spartans were top-ranked the first half the season and Notre Dame climbed from No. 6 in the preseason poll to No. 2 before the Irish eventually surpassed the Spartans despite Michigan State not losing a game.

There has been revisionist history that Alabama’s unbeaten 10-0 team should have been No. 1. Notre Dame backup quarterback Coley O’Brien, who rallied the Irish to the 10-10 tie, said Notre Dame always felt the national title was between the Irish and Spartans from the day Notre Dame lost to Michigan State in the 1965 regular-season finale. The 1966 all-white Alabama team was never tested outside the segregated South. The Crimson Tide played eight games at three home fields – Tuscaloosa, Birmingham and Mobile – and never traveled further than neighboring Mississippi and Tennessee. None of Alabama’s 10 opponents were ranked. Alabama fans complain they were victims of reverse racism. I don’t know how anyone can make that case with a straight face.

What is Daugherty’s legacy?

Duffy’s legacy extends generations to the children of players he recruited. To dismiss his recruitment of the segregated South merely to win football games is a gross misperception. He had six southern players from the South on his 1965-66 teams earn All-American or All-Big Ten honors. Well, no one goes six for six in recruiting. The 44 players were grateful for their chance to escape the South and had a 68-percent graduate rate at a time when academic support systems aren’t what they are now. In the 1980s, the NCAA-reported graduation rate for black players was in the 30s before the NCAA cracked down with established standards.

Clifton Roaf never played a down due to an injury, but he is retired after 40 years as a dentist. Roaf’s son is Pro and College Hall-of-Famer Willie Roaf, but he also has a daughter who is a professor at Northern Arizona. Roaf says he is “indebted to the people of Michigan State.” Ernie Pasteur was injured but went on to a distinguished career in education. His son is a West Point graduate and his daughter a college law professor at Michigan State. He says he owes his career to Duffy.

 

 

RIP women media pioneers: First female ESPN sports anchor, MLB beat writer

Last week marked the passing of two women who helped lay the foundation for future generations.

******

ESPN remembered Rhonda Glenn, its first women sports anchor. I knew Rhonda from her work with the United States Golf Association.

From John Skipper:

“All of us at ESPN are deeply saddened by the news of Rhonda Glenn’s passing. As ESPN’s first female anchor, she is an important part of our history and someone who was a pioneer in our business. We extend our deepest sympathies to her family and many friends.” This Front Row profile was published in April 2013.”

ESPN Front Row re-posted a story about Glenn talking about her experience at ESPN.

As it has been in many other areas, ESPN was and remains a leader in providing opportunities for women, and that was certainly the case in 1981 when Rhonda Glenn sat down behind theSportsCenter desk. Two years after ESPN launched in 1979, Glenn, at the age of 34, made history as the first fulltime female sportscaster for a national television network.

“The fact that I was on what you would call the ‘cutting edge’ really didn’t make an impact on me,” said Glenn, who left ESPN after two years and has worked in communications for the United States Golf Association (USGA) since 1996. “It wasn’t something I strived for. I never wanted to be the first, I just wanted the job.”

A standout amateur and collegiate golfer, Glenn had been working in television since 1969, starting as a sports reporter in Norfolk, Va., and had been a women’s golf analyst for ABC Sports for three years when she started with ESPN.

 “The difference then was that wherever I went, I was the only woman,” she said. “I just felt, ‘Well, I can do this, and I’m going to apply.’”

Once she arrived at ESPN, Glenn quickly fit in.

“It was a very casual atmosphere then,” she said. “ESPN had not been on the air that long. We had a really nice studio building and a nice newsroom.

“It was a little crowded because I think they were having to hire more people than they may have thought they would, but it was 24 hours so you had to have a lot of people to do that.”

******

Meanwhile, the Toronto Star did a tribute to Alison Gordon, who died at the age of 72. She made history for being the first women to be a beat writer for a baseball team.

Before she took over the Blue Jays’ beat for the Toronto Star in 1979, Alison Gordon was a highly regarded humorist and comedy writer, talents she eventually discovered would serve her well as she chronicled the daily grind of a fledgling ball club.

“You had to have a sense of humour to cover the Blue Jays,” she told the Star in 1984, “at least in the first few years.”

As Major League Baseball’s first female beat writer, Gordon also needed a thick skin, and she had that, too.

“She was relentless,” said Lloyd Moseby, who played for the Jays throughout the 1980s. “A lot of women that are in the profession right now should be very thankful for what Alison did and what she went through. She took a beating from the guys. She was a pioneer for sure.”