Networks, analysts high on Bulls IF a certain guard stays healthy

My latest Chicago Tribune column is on the networks looking forward to the return of Derrick Rose–again.

You also can access the column via my Twitter at @Sherman_Report.

From the column:

******

Welcome back, Derrick Rose. Signed, your friends at ESPN, TNT, and NBA TV.

The return of the star guard will have the Bulls in the national spotlight early and often this year. The Bulls-Knicks opener kicks off ESPN’s NBA regular-season coverage on Wednesday. All told, the Bulls will be featured on 10 games on ESPN; 10 on TNT, 5 on ABC; and 5 on NBA TV.

The national analysts think the bright lights then will shine on the Bulls deep into the spring, if not early summer.

“Barring major injury, I can’t see Chicago or Cleveland not finding their way to the Eastern Conference Finals,” said ESPN/ABC analyst Jeff Van Gundy.

TNT’s Greg Anthony goes further, saying “the Bulls are the team to beat in the East.”

As always, there’s the big IF for the Bulls when it comes to Rose. After what happened last year, virtually every assessment of the Bulls is preceded by the qualifier, “If Rose stays healthy…”

Van Gundy thinks expectations need to be tempered for Rose.

“Anybody who is expecting Rose to consistently be what he was the other night against Cleveland (when he scored 30 points Monday), doesn’t understand how hard it is in the NBA to regain your edge,” Van Gundy said. “When you are basically out two years, it’s not easy, even when you’re as talented as Rose.  And so that consistency of play, of recreating great habits on the floor, that will be difficult and it will be challenging. There will be some great moments and there will be some moments where he’s disappointed.”

TNT’s Reggie Miller contends Rose will need to make adjustments in his game.

“To me, it’s all upstairs for Derrick Rose,” Miller said. “His body is ready. It’s almost over ready. After two years off, your mind starts to play tricks on you. He’s going to have to change his game. He can’t be that Tasmanian Devil-type player who is always attacking and hitting the floor. He’s going to have to trust his basketball mechanics and jump shot. If he can do that, he can have an efficient year.”

Long-time Detroit baseball writer retiring after 29 years on the beat

Best wishes to John Lowe, the excellent baseball writer for the Detroit Free-Press, who is moving on after the World Series.

Lowe served 29 years on the beat, which is the equivalent of 129 years in real life. Yet you would be hard-pressed to find someone who looked forward more to the next game on the schedule.

Ken Rosenthal of Fox Sports wrote:

“John told our Jon Paul Morosi –€“ one of the many young writers he mentored –€“ that the decision was his alone. Of course it was. He is retiring at the peak of his powers. John still can write an evocative game story, a lost art in today’€™s Internet age. And at a time when the beat is for much younger men, his ability to connect the present to the past was unmatched among us. … I can only hope the Baseball Writers Association of America votes John its highest honor, the J.G. Taylor Spink Award, for meritorious contributions to baseball writing. Rarely will it be more deserved.”

 

Van Gundy: With new mega TV deal, NBA should look to cut prices for fans; reduce back-to-backs

Yet more reasons to love Jeff Van Gundy.

The ESPN/ABC analyst showed he is in mid-season form on a teleconference yesterday. He gave some advice on something that needs to be done in the wake of the NBA’s new $24 billion TV deal. Are you listening, Adam Silver?

“I just think we have to keep the fan in mind.  And I think sometimes when you’re in this prosperity era, where everything is going well, we can lose sight of who are the main reasons for our successes – the great players, the people who drive the business aspect, but it’s also the fans that continue to buy the product.

“I think we have to look out as all this money is getting passed around. How can we make it better for the fan?  Is there a way to cut concessions or ticket prices to make it more affordable?  I think it’s something we need to explore.”

I’m sure this is Silver’s response: “We’ll take it under advisement.”

*****

Van Gundy also lobbied for the NBA to reduce or even eliminate the back-to-back games. Again, he had the fans in mind.

“I think this goes to the fan idea. I think fans oftentimes get an inferior product on back-to-back games, and I think that has to be the number one thing that gets addressed for the fans and for the players. – the elimination or the drastic reduction of back-to-back games.  And I think it starts with the owners giving up preseason games.  There’s no need and I’ll tell you how you know there’s no need for these preseason games – it’s because no one plays in them.

“And yet we charge the same prices.  And so let’s stop with the ruse that we need seven preseason games or eight preseason games to get a team ready.  So let’s play two games, three games, and start the regular season two weeks earlier so we can eliminate some back to back games.  Let’s not have as long a period at the All-Star break for back-to-back games.

“So we can reduce them.  And let’s extend the season a week or two in the regular season so that we can drastically reduce – or the goal should be to totally eliminate back-to-back games.  I think that more so than the number of games of 82 or the length of a game of the 48 minutes needs to be changed. Because again, as a fan, they deserve our very best and you never want to give your players excuses, but to expect them to play great after playing the night before and flying three hours to a different time zone to have the same energy I think is a stretch and I think it leads to a lot of bad basketball and doesn’t give the product that we should be giving our fans.”

Silver’s likely response? Thanks, Jeff, but worry about LeBron, Kobe and Derrick.

 

 

 

 

What team was part of most watched World Series game of all-time? Hint: Think small market

Nope, it wasn’t the Yankees, Red Sox, or Dodgers.

The answer: Kansas City-Philadelphia for Game 6 of the 1980 World Series. The Phillies victory over the Royals did a 40 rating with a 60 share.

Let me repeat that again: a 40 rating and 60 share are Super Bowl-like numbers.

Yes, the small-market Royals participated in the most-watched Series game of all time.

The television universe was much smaller back then, but still 54.9 million viewers tuned in to a World Series game on NBC. Overall, that Series averaged a 32.8 rating and 56 share. Fox would do handsprings if the current Series did one-third of those numbers.

Back then, nobody focused on Kansas City being a small-market team, ranking 31st overall. That’s the common narrative today.

In 1980, sports fans watched the World Series because it was the World Series. It didn’t matter who was playing.

In fact, the fourth highest-rated game on the list was Game 7 of the Milwaukee-St. Louis series in 1982, which was seen by 49.9 million viewers. At last check, Milwaukee and St. Louis counted as small-market teams.

Obviously, the sports TV landscape has changed considerably since the ’80s. You know the speech about more choices.

Market size does matter to some degree. However, there’s much more involved.

The comparison is another illustration of how the World Series has slipped as a must-watch event in today’s sports landscape. Back then, you didn’t need the Yankees or Dodgers to carry the day in the Fall Classic. The 31st market Royals did just fine.

 

 

 

 

Fox needs a Kansas City win in Game 2; Opener was dreadful

Well, that was fairly terrible.

The only compelling thing about Game 1 was wondering how much money James Shields was costing himself on the free agent market with his dismal performance. Probably time to rethink the “Big Game” nickname.

The game was essentially over before the Royals came to bat, as the Giants’ big first inning sucked all that feel-good energy out of the Kansas City fans.

The game did a 8.0 overnight rating, down 15 percent from 8.6 in 2013’s Game 1.

Actually considering how bad the game was at a numbing 3:32 pace, the rating was higher than I expected. You know there was major tune-out when the Giants went up 5-0 in the fourth, and the game was past the 90-minute mark. Snooze city.

So perhaps there is some potential for ratings if Kansas City can rebound in Game 2. It also is a pivotal game for Fox. If the Giants take a 2-0 lead to San Franciso, it would be ratings death.

Your turn young Yordano Ventura. Save the series for KC and Fox.

 

 

Rice, Lardner, Runyon: When true giants roamed press box at World Series

My latest column for the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana is on the sportswriter equivalent of Ruth, Gehrig and DiMaggio covering the 1932 World Series.

******

If I could go back to a moment in sports history, I definitely would place myself in Wrigley Field on Oct. 1, 1932.

After being fully immersed in writing my book, Called Shot: The Myth and Mystery Behind Baseball’s Greatest Home Run, it would be great to determine if Babe Ruth really pointed to centerfield during Game 3 of the Yankees-Cubs World Series. However, I also have another reason.

As a sportswriter, I would have given anything to be in that Wrigley Field press box.

I dedicated a chapter in the book to what the sportswriters wrote, or didn’t write, about Ruth’s “Called Shot.” In the early days of radio, and way before TV, sportswriters were kings of all media. Their viewpoints provided crucial evidence in separating myth from reality on that fateful day.

Yet there was something else that also stood out: It might have been the greatest collection of sportswriters ever in a press box.

The Wrigley Field roll call included:

Grantland Rice (pictured above): Perhaps the most important sportswriter of all-time, his colorful prose made legends out of Ruth, Red Grange, Knute Rockne and more. Rice’s celebrity was as big as the stars he covered.

Ring Lardner: One of the first acclaimed sports columnists and a master short story writer, he listed F. Scott Fitzgerald among his friends, and his work influenced a young writer named Ernest Hemingway.

Damon Runyon: He began his career as a sportswriter, but would eventually go on to become a fixture on Broadway. His short stories were the inspiration for the musical, Guys and Dolls, which helped create a vibe for the theater area and beyond in New York.

Arch Ward: The young sports editor of the Chicago Tribune had a brilliant idea to celebrate the 1933 World’s Fair in Chicago. How about an exhibition game featuring the best players of the American League facing the best players of the National League? Thus, the first All-Star game was played in 1933 at Comiskey Park. Fittingly, Ruth hit the first All-Star home run.

Paul Gallico: The New York Daily News sports columnist soon would grow tired of sports in the late ‘30s and decide to write novels. He would go on to write The Snow Goose and The Poseidon Adventure, which would be adapted into a huge hit movie starring Gene Hackman.

Red Smith and Shirley Povich: The press box also included a couple of 27-year-old sportswriters who were just beginning to lay the foundations of their legends: Smith, who was working for the St. Louis Journal, and Povich of the Washington Post.

Imagine Smith and Povich as young sportswriters walking into a World Series press box and seeing Rice, Lardner, Runyon and Gallico and other big names pounding away on their typewriters. It must have been an awesome and inspirational sight.

No offense to the current collection of sportswriters assembled in the press box for this year’s World Series, but the scene has changed considerably. The Fall Classic isn’t even a must-cover for the major sports columnists. When I was assigned to the World Series in the mid-‘80s, I was part of a five-man coverage team for the Chicago Tribune, including three columnists. This year, the Trib is sending one reporter, Paul Sullivan, to cover Kansas City-San Francisco.

Back in 1932, baseball was everything. Pro football barely existed, and it would be decades before the NFL ate up everything, including baseball.

If you were a sportswriter, covering the World Series was the pinnacle. You were part of the ultra elite in the profession.

“The sportswriters were absolutely the best writers on the papers in those days, and baseball writing was the best of all jobs on a newspaper,” said Marshall Hunt in Jerome Holtzman’s fabulous book, No Cheering in the Press Box.

The rules also were quite different back then. The writers traveled on the trains with the teams they covered and often became close friends with the players, including Ruth. None of them dared to write about the slugger’s extracurricular activities away from the field.

Sportswriters served a different role, especially during the early days of the Great Depression. Readers wanted an escape from the bleak economic news. They needed to hear stories about larger-than-life athletes performing larger-than-life exploits.

“The nation was looking for a lift,” MLB historian John Thorn said in my book. “In 1932, it was the heart of the Depression. It was a dark, dark year. The public was anxious to grab on to something that frothy and fun.”

The sportswriters in the Wrigley Field might have been the greatest igniters of Ruth’s “Called Shot.” I detailed their stories from the game in my book.

Joe Williams of the New York World Telegram is largely credited as starting the legend in motion. He wrote: “Ruth pointed to the center field and punched a screaming liner to a spot where no ball ever had been hit before.”

There is a misconception that Williams was the only writer who wrote about “The Called Shot” in his next day story. Actually, that isn’t true, as I document examples from other writers who make a reference to Ruth pointing.

Still, there were plenty of writers who made no mention of “The Called Shot” in their initial stories, thus stirring the debate. Rice was the most prominent. He didn’t dive into Ruth’s signature moment until his second-day column.

Rice wrote:

“His beaming countenance wore a broad grin. He then pointed to center field. And around five seconds later his famous line-drive lash—not much higher than [Primo] Camera’s head—sailed across the barrier.”

Ah yes, they don’t write like that anymore, do they?

The times have changed. While there still are many immensely talented sportswriters, they get dwarfed by personalities on ESPN and elsewhere. Stephen A. Smith has a much higher profile than every columnist in print or on the Web.

So as yet another World Series begins, it is worth recalling that once upon a time, sportswriters ruled the media landscape. In 1932, there were true giants in the Wrigley Field press box.

Oh, how I envy a young Smith and Povich for being there.

Kornheiser on Ben Bradlee: ‘King Arthur in the newroom’; Wanted strong sports section for Post

The tributes are flowing in for Ben Bradlee, a journalism hero if ever there was one. While he always will be tied to Watergate, he also was an avid sports fan. He recognized the importance of building a strong sports section for the Washington Post.

Under the direction of sports editor George Solomon, Bradlee’s Post sports sections excelled with writers such as Thomas Boswell, Tony Kornheiser, Dave Kindred, Michael Wilbon, John Feinstein, Christine Brennan, Sally Jenkins and many more.

Solomon in today’s Post:

“When you’d be beaten by another paper (you’d make sure it did not happen often) on a story that interested Ben, he’d tear out the story and, with a red question mark, write: ‘What’s this?'”

I found this quote from Kornheiser on Bradley:

“I cannot describe to you what I felt, and I’m sure that so many, many others felt, when he walked among us. Ben could have been a king. Ben in that newsroom was King Arthur. I mean, he was.”

From Michael Wilbon’s farewell column in the Post in 2010:

“I arrived at the paper close enough to the end of Watergate that Robert Redford was still occasionally popping into the newsroom to visit Bob Woodward, the man he portrayed in “All The President’s Men.” As difficult as it is for me to accept the notion that I became a colleague of the world’s best reporter, it’s nothing compared with the complete awe, even 30 years later, I still feel whenever I’m in the company of Ben Bradlee, even if it’s just seeing him in the elevator.”

 

 

Will KC-SF produce all-time low rating? Fox really needs a 7-game Series

On the one hand, Kansas City is a great story. America loves an underdog, and the small market Royals returning to the World Series fills the bill.

Unfortunately, there are plenty of other hands for this year’s World Series.

The series features two wildcard teams, neither of which won 90 games. There is a huge vacuum of star power.

Kansas City doesn’t have a George Brett to give it instant identity. However, you can be sure Fox will show plenty of shots of Brett cheering in his private box.

While the Giants could win their third World Series in the last five years, they might go down as the dullest dynasty of all time. Buster Posey is a great player, but you don’t stop everything to watch him at the plate.

The Giants have not been much-watch TV.

The Giants’ last World Series appearance produced an all-time low 7.6 rating in 2012. OK, blame the four-game sweep.

Well, in 2010, the Giants’ five-game victory over Texas delivered an 8.4, the second lowest in the last five years after 2012.

So what’s the over-under prediction for this year’s Series?

Anything less than six games seems certain to produce an all-time low rating. Bet the under at 7.6.

Fox and MLB really need this Series to go at least six games and probably seven to capture the casual sports fan. Even then, last year’s Boston-St. Louis match-up, which went six games featuring two storied franchises, only did a 8.9 rating.

The odds seem stacked against KC-SF producing a decent rating. But maybe Fox will get lucky, and will get a terrific World Series.

 

 

 

 

New 30 for 30: When Willis, Clyde and Knicks rocked the Garden

Bill Russell’s great Celtics teams were a bit before my time. So some of my first basketball memories were formed by the great Knicks teams in the late ’60s, early ’70s.

Tonight’s new 30 for 30 pays tribute that team and that era in “When The Garden Was Eden” (ESPN, 9 p.m.)

I did not have a chance to see the screener, but Ben Koo of Awful Announcing raved about the film in his review.

Here is the trailer.

A clip on Phil Jackson.

The magic of playing in The Garden.

l
l