10-year anniversary of greatest day ever: White Sox win World Series

This is our national holiday for White Sox fans. On Oct. 26, 2005, all of our years of faith and frustration finally were rewarded when the Sox closed out their four-game sweep of Houston.

It was a moment we never expected to see in our lifetimes. And it was an intensely personal moment for me.

The White Sox dream year coincided with my sons, Matt, then 10, and Sam, then 8, finally getting into sports. And it happened overnight. They went from watching “Spongebob” to “SportsCenter.”

During Game 4, I was supposed to report on John Rooney’s radio call for the Chicago Tribune. As the game neared its end, I took my recorder and went to another room. Unfortunately, or fortunately, I didn’t get far enough away. When Paul Konerko collected the final out, my kids erupted. When I turned on my recorder, all I heard was Matt and Sam screaming over Rooney’s call. Safe to say, it has become a cherished piece of audio.

After filing my story, I then called my father, Jerry, who was living in Sarasota at the time. Despite failing health, he insisted on coming up for Games 1 and 2 in Chicago. It wasn’t easy, but he made it. They turned out to be the last Sox games this true diehard Sox fan ever saw in person. There’s something poetic in that.

When Dad picked up the phone after Game 4, he didn’t say hello. “Can you believe it? Can you believe it?” he said.

In that instant, I thought of all those years of going to Sox games together; complaining about players we hated; lamenting over victories that evaporated in the ninth inning; and the too few many cheers. All of those years with the White Sox deepening a bond that still endures even though Dad passed away in 2007.

After all those years, we finally had our ultimate moment.

“Believe it, Dad,” I said.

 

Expect more NFL games on Internet: Big numbers for Bills-Jaguars

This is pretty amazing considering the teams involved. This game wasn’t Brady vs. Manning.

From Yahoo Sports:

If you stream it, they will come.

Yahoo and the NFL announced on Monday that Sunday’s exclusive live stream of the Bills-Jaguars game from London attracted a huge global audience: 15.2 million unique viewers and 33.6 million total views.

Those viewers streamed over 460 million total minutes of the game with over 33 percent of the streams being used by international users across 185 worldwide. It was the first time that international viewers were able to access a NFL game without cable or satellite.

In comparison, 1.8 million unique users tuned into the WatchESPN app for the 2014 World Cup final between Germany and Brazil, though that game was also broadcast over the air.

Sunday’s audience was almost twice the size of the average audience (7.9 million) that TBS attracted for last week’s NLCS between the Chicago Cubs and New York Mets.

Peter King reports at MMQB that fans can expect to see more NFL games air on the Net:

“We’re a lot closer to the internet being a real, legitimate distribution platform for NFL games than we were one or two years ago,” NFL executive vice president of media Brian Rolapp told me late Sunday night. And there’s little doubt that, though the league treats its 256 regular-season games like home-TV gold, it’s likely to parcel out more than one game to an internet company in 2016.

That will make fans around the world happy. “The streaming quality was fantastic,” said Marcelo Fujimoto, a Cleveland-raised Browns fan who watched in São Paulo, Brazil. “It was like watching a game on TV.”

Vietnam checked in with praise. “It was better than I expected,” said Tyrone Carriaga, another football fan who watched in Ho Chi Minh City. “No freeze screen at all.”

 

Lost art of using phone is bad trend for journalism, public relations

phoneExcerpts from my latest column for Poynter:

******

At the dawn of 2015, I made a New Year’s resolution. I vowed to try to rely less on email and actually use the good old-fashioned phone to reach out to public relations people on my various beats. Even if I didn’t have anything on the agenda, I planned to dial someone’s number just to see what was going on.

You know, how’s the family? What’s the latest at your place?

Of course, New Year’s resolutions never stick. So along with my vow to read more and eat less, I haven’t come close to calling PR folks as much as I had hoped.

I make that admission to show that I am just as guilty as anyone in being part of a horrible trend in media: Journalists and PR people have forgotten how to use the phone.

I’m not saying nobody uses the phone. However, I am fairly confident about this thought: Perhaps not since Alexander Graham Bell unveiled his new invention has the phone been used less in media interactions at many levels.

“If [using the phone] has become a lost art, that’s a damn shame,” said Vince Wladika, the former PR head for Fox Sports who now does consulting for companies like Comcast and Tribune Media.

Indeed, it’s all about sending emails, texting, and communicating through social media these days. If you are a reporter, think about how many calls you receive from PR representatives making a story pitch. I’m fairly sure the answer is, not many.

*****

Malcolm Moran, the director of the sports journalism program at Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, believes there’s something even bigger at stake with the heavy reliance on emails.

“The technology has overtaken relationship building and maintenance,” Moran said.

Indeed, relationships seem to be the biggest casualty of the email/text age. They can’t be the same when reporters and PR people aren’t having phone conversations, much less face-to-face contact [another infrequent exercise].

Wladika wondered if enough emphasis is being put on relationship building at the college level.

“Are people being taught to cultivate their contacts?” Wladika said.

Moran can’t speak for other schools, but he emphasizes it to his students.

“I tell them, ‘If you’re not making an effort to get to know [a PR person], why would they have reason to share anything with you?’” Moran said.

Metropolitans? NY Times uses 1908 writing style, newspaper design for Mets Game 4 clincher

I’m guessing the Times probably had this idea in place if the Cubs won the World Series. They still decided to use it even though the Mets won in four games, and it was only the NLCS.

After all, nothing is guaranteed and who knows when the Cubs will get in that position again?

Here is the link to D. Francis Barry’s story written in 1908 style.

CHICAGO, Oct. 21 — The New York Metropolitans claimed decisive possession of the National League base-ball pennant on enemy turf here at Wrigley Field on Wednesday night, sweeping the Sisyphean Chicago Cubs in four games to earn their ducats to next week’s World Series championship.

The Metropolitans — also known as the “Mets” — sent six safely across the plate before the third inning, mostly as a result of the derring-do of their Bunyanesque first-sacker, Lucas Duda. The mighty Californian smote a home run and a double to tally five of those six runs before the Cubs seemed to comprehend that a game concerning their possible erasure from the 2015 field was well underway.

And the front page. In the upper left corner, it says, “Dispatch from Chicago: 107-year late edition.

Times Cubs

 

Sports Media Friday: Fisk’s homer changed sports TV forever; Skipper’s message about ESPN job cuts

Spanning the globe to bring you the constant variety of sports media:

How Carlton Fisk’s epic homer changed everything in sports TV. Must read piece from Tom Verducci in Sports Illustrated.

John Skipper explains why ESPN made job cuts.

James Andrew Miller writes in Vanity Fair about the fallout from Bill Simmons’ departure from Grantland.

Ed Odeven did a terrific three-part interview covering the vast career of Jerry Izenberg. Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3.

Bob Costas is writing his autobiography with Mike Lupica.

Yahoo is the outlet for Sunday’s Buffalo-Jacksonville game in London.

Was Steve Spurrier auditioning last week to be Lee Corso’s replacement on ESPN College GameDay?

Cartoonist Gary Varvel offered his take to Chuck Pagano’s flawed trick play.

Media rights for sports programming expected to increase at 7.2 percent per year through 2019.

Are today’s sportswriters capable of writing the great game story lead?

Oh what might have been for TBS; Mets sweep over Cubs was worst-case scenario

The ratings for a 4-game sweep were big. Imagine if the games were more competitive and the Cubs-Mets series went six, even, seven games.

Here’s TBS trying to put a happy face on what could have been a much bigger ratings bonanza.

********

TBS’ exclusive presentation of the National League throughout the MLB Postseason – Wild Card, Division Series and League Championship Series – averaged 6.3 million total viewers and a 3.9 U.S. HH rating for 14 game telecasts to deliver the network’s most-viewed postseason coverage of all time, according to Nielsen Fast Nationals.  This year’s MLB Postseason on TBS is up 48% in total viewers and 44% in U.S. HH rating over the network’s postseason telecasts in 2014.  TBS’ MLB Postseason coverage also generated double-digit growth across all key demos including a58% increase in People 18-49.

The network’s exclusive coverage of the 2015 National League Championship Series – with the New York Mets sweeping the Chicago Cubs in four games – averaged 7.9 million total viewers and a 4.8 U.S. HH rating to garnerTBS’ most-viewed NLCS coverage of all time and the most-watched NLCS across all of television since 2010.  This year’s NLCS coverage is up 58% in total viewers and 50% in U.S. HH rating over the network’s NLCS telecasts in 2013, with increases of 55% in total viewers and 50% in U.S. HH rating vs. last year’s comparable ALCS airing on TBS.

Last night’s decisive NLCS Game 4 on TBS generated an average of 7.9 million total viewers and a 5.0 U.S. HH rating – peaking with an average of 8.6 million total viewers from 10:30-10:45 p.m. ET – to rank as the network’s most-viewed NLCS Game 4 on record.  The telecast won the night across all of cable television, based on metered market delivery.

This years’ NLCS Game 4 is up 99% in total viewers and 86% in U.S. HH rating over the network’s ALCS Game 4 telecast last year (Kansas City/Baltimore, ALCS Game 4 – four million total viewers; 2.7 U.S. HH rating). Locally, the telecast delivered an 18.9 HH rating in Chicago and an 18.8 HH rating in New York.

Turner’s TV Everywhere platforms also delivered record-setting numbers this postseason including more than 63 million minutes consumed, an increase of 60% over last year.  Live streaming across the platforms was also up 126% in unique visits during the postseason and 74% in video streams.

Author Q/A: New book on Ohio State’s improbable national title features interesting insights into Urban Meyer

Buckeyes bookAfter writing “Buckeye Rebirth” on the 2012 Ohio State football team, Bill Rabinowitz didn’t think he would do another book on them.

Then 2014 happened.

When the Buckeyes won the national title despite losing their first game and two quarterbacks, Rabinowitz, who covers the team for the Columbus Dispatch, knew he had to do a sequel. The end result is his new book, “The Chase: How Ohio State Capture the First College Football Playoff.”

Rabinowitz delivers an entertaining read that goes beyond the games. Here is my Q/A.

After writing a book on Buckeyes 2012 season, did you have reservations about doing another book so quickly, even if it was for a title season?

I’d be lying if I said I didn’t. Writing a book is a huge undertaking and trying to do it in four months, which is what was required to have the book out by the start of football season, is particularly daunting. But in the end, I felt absolutely compelled to write this book. If I wrote one about a team that couldn’t even play in the postseason, as I did with “Buckeye Rebirth,” how could I not do one on a national championship team, especially one that had the unprecedented journey this Ohio State team had? I covered the team for the Columbus Dispatch, so I knew what had happened, but I really wanted to dig deeper about how and why it happened, and the only way to do that is with a book.

What kind of access did you get to coaches, players? Who stood out?

I was fortunate to get great access. Having done “Buckeye Rebirth” helped because the coaches and many of the players understood what I was looking for and what the contours of the book would be. Urban Meyer was initially hesitant about cooperating because he has his own book on leadership coming out. I understood that and wouldn’t have begrudged him if he didn’t consent to interviews, but he decided pretty quickly that he would cooperate. Obviously, I’m grateful for that. The book couldn’t have been as good without his insights. It’s funny, when he agreed to be interviewed, I said, “Thank you. Anyplace, anytime.” So, of course, he asked me to talk to him at 6:30 a.m. on a Sunday, which happened to be Daylight Savings Time switchover day, so body time it was 5:30. He was signing memorabilia for his foundation in the storage room of a local hotel then and figured talking to me would break up the monotony. I got there at 6:22 a.m., beating him there, about which I was quite proud. Sportswriters like to sleep in when we can.

As he was with the first book, Meyer put no limits on what I could ask and answered everything insightfully. I talked to him twice for a total of about five hours. I also spoke at length, sometimes for hours, with every assistant coach. They were all invaluable. I especially appreciated Tom Herman giving me a lot of time while still settling in as the University of Houston’s head coach.

I was lucky to have a pool of players to talk to that were unusually reflective and mature for college players. You can’t get much better interview subjects than guys like Michael Bennett, Jeff Heuerman, Evan Spencer, Taylor Decker and Joshua Perry. Cardale Jones was tough to pin down, but once I did, he was fantastic talking about his tough upbringing in Cleveland and adversity at Ohio State. I talked to every key player except two — Devin Smith, because we just never found time to talk, and Braxton Miller, who maintained media silence until the summer.

Meyer seems like an interesting character. What does it say about him that he uses so many outside sources in forming his leadership/coaching philosophies?

This is in the book, but what stands out about him is that he combines tremendous raw intelligence with the open-mindedness and flexibility to adapt and change if someone has an idea that can improve the status quo. One example: Last year, Ash watched a Pete Carroll video about the benefits of rugby-style tackling. That style of tackling emphasizes using shoulders instead of head and is considered safer. Ash pitched switching to coaching that way of tackling, and Meyer agreed to do it. That decision paid off. Aside from the safety issue, the Buckeyes were an improved tackling team. Meyer is never satisfied that he has the answers and is constantly seeking a better way of doing things. Usually, very smart people think they know it all. Meyer is relentlessly curious.

Be truthful, after they lost to Va. Tech and struggled in some Big Ten games, losing two QBs, did you ever think they would win a national title?

Oh, of course! I wrote at the time that were sandbagging to make it more dramatic. Obviously, I figured their national title hopes were all but dead, not so much because they lost but because that night they just didn’t look like a team with championship potential. But what looked at the time to be an albatross, especially when Virginia Tech tanked after beating OSU, proved to be a springboard. The Buckeyes had gotten so used to winning that they started to take it for granted. That loss changed their mindset. Then as Barrett and the offensive line matured, the team really took off.

How much did that Wisconsin blowout change the season?

It meant everything. First of all, beating the Badgers gave the Buckeyes a championship. For all their success in Meyer’s first two years, they hadn’t won a title. There was a lot of pressure to do that. And then the way they dismantled Wisconsin was stunning. Nobody — not even the Buckeyes — thought they’d win by anything like 59-0. But a blowout like that is what was needed. They played close to a perfect game.
I interviewed College Football Playoff selection committee head Jeff Long for the book, and though he couldn’t say exactly what it took for Ohio State to get in, it’s doubtful that a 24-17 win would have done it. Long also had an interesting comment about Florida State regarding their deliberations that readers of the book will find interesting.

Where does this national title rank in OSU’s history?

Ohio State has six national championships — some claim two other ones that most find dubious — and it’s hard to top this one. The 1968 team was special because it was dominated by sophomores and thus was a surprise. The 2002 team had so many close calls that its championship with the upset of Miami makes that title revered. But I think this one might top them all. First, it was the inaugural year of the CFP. That made it unique. But really, it was all the storylines and personalities and adversity that made that season so compelling. You have Meyer, whose championship cemented his place among the pantheon of college coaches. You had a team that was down to its third-string quarterback. You had the Virginia Tech loss. There was the tragic suicide of defensive lineman Kosta Karageorge, which had an incredible effect on the team. I’ve heard from several people that 2014 felt like a movie, except that no one would believe it. I really feel privileged to be able to tell the story of this team.

One more thing from Rabinowitz:

What I tried to do with “The Chase” is what I tried to do with “Buckeye Rebirth,” which was to go beyond the surface and have this be much more than a rehash of the season. My goal was to tell the story of the people involved. In other words, it’s not a “football book,” but a book about interesting, compelling people who happen to be involved in football. My wife knows next to nothing about sports. It’s almost comical how an otherwise intelligent (and, of course, beautiful) woman can be so clueless about football. But when she read the manuscript — she’s a former editor — she loved it. I’d hear her laughing and then I’d see her crying after reading certain parts.

As time passes, the memory fades a little bit about how dramatic a season it was. I believe “The Chase” captures what it was really like for the Buckeyes to experience all they did through the highs and lows of a magical season. I hope that it stands as the definitive account of how their 2014 season came about.

Upcoming 30 for 30 to focus on 1988 Notre Dame national champions; epic game against Miami

I will have more than a passing interest in this 30 for 30. I covered the 1988 national champs for the Chicago Tribune. Notre Dame’s 31-30 win over Miami ranks among the top 5 games I ever covered.

Eric Hansen of the South Bend Tribune with the details on the upcoming film:

Tuesday they’ll be at the home of Holtz, and later interviewing former Miami quarterback Steve Walsh, Rice’s counterpart in the epic 31-30 Irish upset at ND Stadium that slingshotted ND from the No. 4 spot in the polls to a stranglehold on No. 1 they would not relinquish in 1988.

“It’s like asking someone who’s driving coast to coast, ‘How is you cross-country road trip going?’ And you haven’t even left Maine yet,” said Creadon, the project’s director.

Like Creadon, Jerry Barca was in the stadium that day. One of the producers on the project and the author of “Unbeatable,” Barca was just 11 years old at the time, but he convinced his parents to let him fly by himself from New Jersey and stay for the weekend with his older brother, an ND student at the time.

“I don’t think there will ever be anything like it in college football again,” he said of the intensity of the rivalry between the two then-independents, a game that actually exceeded the pregame hype and the bravado and dominance Miami brought to the table before and just after.

 

With ARod addition, is Barry Bonds next in line as next baseball studio analyst for Fox Sports?

ARODBarry Bonds has to be going, “Why not me?”

Certainly, if Fox could use Alex Rodriguez, who was suspended for using PEDs, as a studio analyst for the postseason, there has to be a place for Bonds, who escaped the baseball police.

Once again, it is curious that MLB signed off on Fox using ARod, one of the game’s all-time rogues, for its coverage of the biggest games of the year. Earlier, MLB did the same for Pete Rose, who continues to be banned from the game but not its broadcasts.

Consider this: After Frank Thomas, who already has a plaque in Cooperstown, Raul Ibanez, Fox baseball’s other studio analyst, has a better chance of getting into the Hall of Fame than ARod or Rose.

Richard Sandomir of the New York Times offered his take of the unique set-up:

Rose and Rodriguez were never even alone on the set. But late in the show, they cheerfully fist-bumped over Rodriguez’s assertion that he has a “Ph.D in getting booed.” The host, Kevin Burkhardt, never steered the banter to the subject of banishment, choosing to keep it on A.L.C.S. business. Rose, loud and raucous, and Rodriguez, smartly dressed and brimming with baseball insight, did not share their opinions about who barred them, Bart Giamatti and Bud Selig, or the subjects of their respective punishment (gambling and illicit drug use).

Instead, they played their roles as if they had always been good citizens of baseball, a television fiction, but at times an entertaining and fast-moving one. In the hourlong show before Game 3 of the A.L.C.S. — which the Kansas City Royals were leading by two games to none over the Toronto Blue Jays — Rodriguez handled each question well, and was probably measuring a seat for his post-Yankee employment. He has an affinity for the camera, knows which way to turn as he starts his answers and does not stumble over his words.

You were trying to seduce us, Mr. Rodriguez!