Spanning the globe to bring you the constant variety of sports media….
NFL Today: Jason McIntyre at Big Lead writes CBS could make some changes to its pregame show, which trails Fox in the ratings.
Bringing in recently-retired tight end Tony Gonzalez to replace Shannon Sharpe. Gonzalez and CBS have been in talks about joining the show, but he’s West Coast-based, and the show is out of New York. Gonzalez is wrestling with the idea of weekly travel during the season. FOX’s show is based in LA and appears to be an ideal fit, but it can’t offer him a spot because it isn’t going to tinker with the show’s chemistry. Given the option of Fox Sports 1 or NFL Today on CBS, what would you do? The other issue is that Gonzalez and Sharpe or apparently close friends. Another option: Simply adding Gonzalez. But is six people on the set too many?
Younger announcers: Matt Yoder at Awful Announcing says in the wake of Kevin Burkhardt doing a playoff game for Fox, he would like to see other younger announcers get the opportunity to work big games.
Announcing jobs in sports is one of the few professions in society that isn’t continually based on merit. Imagine if your productivity or quality of work dropped at your day job. You would be demoted or even fired if your work suffered a great deal. What about the sports that these networks cover? The Super Bowl and World Series aren’t contested between the same two teams every year, so why should networks assign the same announcers week after week, year after year to their biggest sporting events? Fans should ask themselves – is it really the birthright of Jim Nantz, Phil Simms, Joe Buck, Tim McCarver, Al Michaels, Bob Costas, Chris Berman and others to be in their positions as lifetime appointments? Instead of a merit based system, once announcers climb the ladder to the top they stay there until they decide to walk away no matter how much criticism or praise their work may receive.
Baseball’s TV money imbalance: Jack Moore of Sports on Earth writes about how the big money going to some teams for local TV rights will throw competitive balance further out of whack in baseball.
The past three years have been the perfect time to strike and renegotiate a huge windfall for a franchise. The multi-billion dollar deals negotiated by the Dodgers, Angels, Rangers and now Phillies have all occured since 2010. The big question, though — one examined in great detail by Patrick Hruby on this site
last year — is when this bubble will burst. If teams like the Astros and Padres are already having issues getting cable providers to pay carriage fees, what will the market look like in five years when the Brewers, Royals, Pirates and Cardinals (all earning under $30 million in rights fees without an equity stake in the network) can finally renegotiate their TV deals?This sounds like a question the fan who only cares about results on the field can ignore, but massive competitive balance implications rest on its answer. In leagues like MLB where players have free agency, studies have shown nothing — not a salary cap , not player drafts — leads to more competitive balance than more revenue sharing. And although MLB’s revenue sharing program will throw some of the new TV money down to the smaller market, late-negotiating clubs, it might not be enough to offset the growing gap in gross rights fee revenue and the non-shared money coming from club-owned equity stakes (like the one in Philadelphia).
SEC Network: John Ourand and Michael Smith of Sports Business Journal write about the subscriber fees for the new network: $1.30 per month within the SEC footprint.
Cable operators are certain to blanche at the network’s price tag, which is more expensive than other college conference channels like Big Ten Network and Pac-12 Networks.
Ian Eagle and Dan Fouts: Richard Deitsch of SI.com says they should become CBS’ No. 2 team on the NFL.
“I happen to agree with you,” said an executive at a competing network who works on the NFL. “Ian Eagle is a true pro, calls a great game and has more personality than he’s given credit for. Dan Fouts has always been underrated. But I bet they pursue someone new and pair them with [Greg] Gumbel as No. 2 team.”
Sports books: Seth Davis selects his top eight basketball books of all time for Men’s Journal. And No. 1 is…?
Davis’s favorite book is not a controversial choice. ‘A Season on the Brink‘ is John Feinstein’s magnum opus about the Indiana University basketball program’s 1985–86 season and a psychological profile of controversial coach Bobby Knight. The book created a new genre: fly-on-the-wall descriptions of a single team’s campaigns.
“He had the foresight and the ability to recognize that he had unique access to a unique human being,” Davis says. “To me, that book is a textbook on the power of access, which you don’t always get.”
Journ school: Michael Bradley, writing for the National Sports Journalism Center site at Indiana, says even with everything changing in the media world, the same fundamentals still apply.
It’s an exciting time to be studying – and teaching – journalism, because of the constant advancements and changes designed to keep up with improved technology and societal tastes. What can’t be ignored amidst the wave of the new is the enduring need for journalists to do their jobs properly, delivery methods be damned. If you can’t report, interview, cultivate sources, organize facts, and yes write, it doesn’t matter how many Twitter followers you have. You won’t be relevant or reliable.