Really enjoyed this post by Bryan Curtis. It should be read by every current and future sportswriter. There’s a lot of reality here.
Some samples:
“great piece!” (exp.) — a compliment for a story that’s longer than 2,000 words.
instant classic (n.) — a close game a sportswriter happened to watch live.
Random Thoughts (n.) — a new name for the old “Notes” column.
source close to the process, a (n.) — the most anonymous tipster in sportswriting. A “source close to the process” could be a player, a general manager, an agent, or a pool boy. A writer in search of an equally vague term might try “a source familiar with the team’s thinking.”
Golden Age of Sportswriting (n.) — usually the 1920s, but the phrase may refer to the glory days of Laguerre’s Sports Illustrated, Walsh’s Inside Sports, or the Gammons-Ryan-McDonough Boston Globe sports section. Stanley Woodward, 1949: “After considerable research I can find no evidence to support the theory that sports writing had any good old days. … The only thing that interests me is the modern American sports page which, as far as I can see, owes nothing to antiquity. It didn’t even evolve. It sprang full-fashioned from the forehead of Zeus.”
And there’s much more. Worth the read.
Can past sportswriters read this, too?
Yes, indeed. Mr. Ruda.
Thanks for every other wonderful post. The place else may anybody get that type of info in such a perfect means of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and I am at the search for such info.