My latest column for the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana features a chat with Jim Kaat on my biggest complaint: The numbing length of baseball games.
*******
I say to Jim Kaat that he still could pitch a game in two hours, 15 minutes these days.
“I don’t know about that,” Kaat laughed.
Kaat is right. Make it two-and-a-half hours. After all, Kaat is 74.
Nearly 40 years ago, anything over two hours for a game Kaat started was considered a marathon. In 1974, Kaat, then 35, used a quick-pitch approach to revive his career with back-to-back 20-win seasons with the White Sox. He would get the ball and throw it in virtually the same motion.
“The umps loved me and the vendors hated me,” Kaat said.
Here’s why: On May 31, 1975, Kaat and the Sox lost a 2-0 game to Detroit that lasted an hour, 35 minutes. He routinely had games in the 1:45-1:50 range. If you blinked, you missed three innings.
So if you are looking for an expert to discuss one of baseball’s biggest problems–the maddening slow pace of play–you couldn’t find a better one than Kaat.
Make no mistake, Kaat’s passion for baseball is as high at 74 as it was at 20 when he broke in with the Washington Senators in 1959. Kaat will join Bob Costas for Game 2 of the St. Louis-Pittsburgh series Friday at 1 p.m. (ET) on MLB Network. He also is slated to work a playoff game Monday for MLB Network.
Kaat, though, thinks the game would be better if it moved quicker. He hardly is alone here. Game times have become bloated in the last 20 years. For instance, Game 3 of the 2012 World Series took three hours, 25 minutes. A slugfest, right? No, that was for a 2-0 victory for San Francisco over Detroit.
“Don’t misunderstand me,” Kaat said. “It’s not that I want to get the game over with. It’s just that 2-1 game in three hours, 15 minutes is too long. It’s not necessary.”
Television obviously is a culprit by adding more commercials. To show how much times have changed, Kaat told an amusing story of White Sox General Manager Roland Hemond asking him to take more time between innings.
“I worked so fast, a couple of times, they’d come back from commercial, and there would be one, even two outs,” said the 283-career game winner. “I didn’t have compassion for TV back then. My focus was on pitching. I said to Roland, ‘Do I have to?’ He said, ‘No.’ So I didn’t.”
Any chance of that request being turned down today? Ha. No way, not in an era where TV is king. Kaat thinks the long gaps between innings (two-and-a-half to three minutes) have an impact that carries over once play resumes.
“Players now sit in the dugout and wait because they know they’re going to get two-and-a-half minutes,” Kaat said. “It makes the whole pace, running back on to the field and then playing the game, much slower.”
TV, though, doesn’t get the entire blame here. In Game 2 of the 1965 World Series, Kaat and Minnesota took a 5-1 victory over Sandy Koufax and the Los Angeles Dodgers. The game took two hours, 13 minutes. So let’s add an additional 30 minutes for commercials in the modern telecast. That’s still a game time of two hours, 43 minutes.
Now you’ll be hard-pressed to find a post-season game under three hours. Tuesday, Pittsburgh’s 6-2 victory over Cincinnati went three hours, 14 minutes.
Kaat jokes that he blames Ken “Hawk” Harrelson for introducing the batting glove to baseball. Now every hitter has to step out of the box and adjust his glove after a pitch. He actually charted the numbing routine during a playoff game a few years ago, and it added 35 minutes to the game.
“If Mickey Mantle took a pitch, he’d keep his back foot in place and reset his front foot,” Kaat said. “He’d be ready to go. You never see that today.”
The other “little things,” as Kaat says, bog down the game: Repeated catcher’s visits to the mound; more pitching changes than back in his era; and don’t get him started on theme music for individual hitters.
“Now they all wait in the on-deck circle for their theme music to begin,” Kaat said. “It’s ridiculous.”
The concern, Kaat and others say, is that long games are turning off viewers, especially in the younger demographics. This is a fast-paced society and games that run on at three hours, 30 minutes are too languid to captivate short attention spans, young and old. I see it in my own home. My 18-year-old son, Matt, told me he is more excited about watching early-season hockey games than postseason baseball.
Frankly, I’m not sure why the networks don’t push MLB harder to improve the pace of these big games. More isn’t better here.
Obviously, MLB can put rules in place to speed up the game, but old habits die hard. Kaat contends the key now is for baseball to get players in the minor leagues. Teach them how to play faster.
“You have to go to the minor leagues with the game on TV in mind,” Kaat said. “Encourage hitters to stay in the box. Encourage pitchers to work faster. You do all those little things, and you could knock off 30-45 minutes off a game.”
What MLB really should do is show those minor leaguers old videos of Kaat working quickly and efficiently on the mound. There’s a reason why he won all those games.
Or better yet, have Kaat suit up. Even at 74, I bet he still can work faster than the kids.
For the latest in sports media, follow me at Sherman_Report.
The emphasis on taking pitches is also a factor, as is the reluctance of umpires to enforce the strike zone. Too many walks and deep counts.
Sometimes you wish the game would never end. I once had front row box seats behind the Cubs dugout for Dodger game, Greg Maddux vs. Orel Hersheiser. Game was over in 1:58. You don’t see that anymore.
Watched the video of Maris hitting his 61st home run. He took the first two pitches and he stayed in the box. No fidgeting, no gloves. Tracy Stallard didn’t waste anytime on the mound either. The at bat, three pitches lasts less than 60 seconds.
It sadly won’t happen but I wish FOX would see Jim Kaat as the quintessential replacement for the retiring Tim McCarver.
I also doubt that back in Kitty Kaat’s day, it didn’t cost HUNDREDS of dollars for a family of four to go to the ball park, PER GAME.
Honestly. If I go to the ballpark, spend all that money, and the game lasts 1:58? I’m feeling seriously ripped off. … Clocks likely won’t improve the quality of the sport. COMPREHENSIVE REPLAY will, but that would add even more time.
Also, Ed, most kids — and adults — haven’t watched a baseball game from beginning to end since the advent of the TV remote control. … You will drive yourself absolutely NUTS if you stress out about the sports’ TV ratings compared to football. Those numbers are for the beancounters. They’re not an accurate indicator of how important baseball is to the sports landscape.
Besides, did you watch PBS’s ‘League of Denial’? … The NFL’s days are numbered. Moms are going to start banning their sons from the game. And that will be that.
Also, I figure your boy would be watching the entire playoff games if his team were actually playing in them with some sort of regularity. And with Selig’s extra wild-card spot, maybe this will help out all you sad-sack Chicago fans down the road …
Anyway, the TV guys should be able to figure out a way to shave off some of that extra time. They’re TV guys. They’re creative. And they’re the ones who cause most of the problems in sports. Let THEM fix it.